12700k
Citizen
Construction & Transport Department
Supporter
Aventura Resident
5th Anniversary
Grave Digger
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
12700k
Inspector
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2021
- Messages
- 329
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
MuscleBound (Represented by 12700k)
Plaintiff
v.
HamsterCorp
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. MuscleBound - Plaintiff
2. HamsterCorp - Defendant
3. JBBCraft (Owner of HamsterCorp) - Defendant
II. FACTS
1. JBBCraft is the owner of the sole proprietorship, Hamster Corp (See: P-009).
2. Plaintiff joined the Discord server; Hamster Corp, at approximately 3:40 PM MT on the 16th of December (See: P-001).
3. Plaintiff opened a ticket in the Discord server at approximately 3:41 PM MT on the 16th of December, seeking a marketing poster design for his brewery, Elking Brews (See: P-002).
4. Defendant let the Plaintiff know that an upfront payment of 50% of the total was needed, at approximately 11:22 PM MT on the 16th of December (See: P-002).
5. Defendant told Plaintiff that it would cost, “1k for the 1x1 [poster], 3k for the 2x2 [poster]” (See: P-003).
6. Plaintiff paid 50% of the $4,000 total, $2,000, upfront, as previously requested by Defendant, at approximately 10:03 PM MT on the 17th of December (See: P-004).
7. At approximately 2:55 PM MT on December 22nd, Plaintiff asked Defendant, “How’s the poster coming along?” to which Defendant responded, “Please dont @ us we were both sleeping” (See: P-005).
8. At approximately 6:15 PM MT on December 24th, Defendant said, “Musclebound the poster will be done when we’re ready, no deadline was agreed upon” (See: P-005).
9. At approximately 7:14 PM MT on December 24th, Plaintiff asked, “Do you guys have a timeline when the work will be done? I’ve just been waiting a long time with no updates, no communication or anything of that sort” to which Defendant responded, “January” (See: P-005).
10. At approximately 7:16 PM MT on December 24th Plaintiff asked, “Okay, can I just get a full refund than? I’d like to just take my business elsewhere” to which Defendant responded, “Of course but i still can’t do that before late January, traveling rn”. Plaintiff responded, “You can’t just type the command anywhere? It’s just /pay”. Defendant then said “Deaduzz?” (See: P-005).
11. Defendant attempted to pay Plaintiff using the Server bot in the DemocracyCraft Discord server, he told Plaintiff, “Let me try. I think your lawyer got a little mad so i actually cant type in the dc server so youll have to wait” (See: P-006).
12. Defendant was temporarily deported for “Respect - Toxicity” at approximately 01:57 (server time) on December 25th (See: P-007).
13. Defendant’s deportation expired at approximately 01:58 (server time) on December 30th (See: P-007).
14. At approximately 8:06 PM MT on January 1st, Plaintiff asks Defendant, “So where’s the refund???”. Defendant responded, “Where da patience?” Plaintiff responded, “It’s January”. Defendant responded, “That it is. You asked in December. Still on vacation”. Plaintiff said, “It’s been over two weeks since I gave you money and I’ve received neither my money or the poster” to which Defendant responded, “Correct” (See: P-006).
15. Defendant proceeded to mock and belittle Plaintiff, saying, “Youll get that refund man hang in there
”. Defendant also sent stickers that included; an AI generated hamster wearing business formal attire, a child sitting next to a wolf, with the caption, “Don’t you give up. Nah nah nah 
” Defendant also sent an invitation to a game of 8 Ball Pool. He sent an Instagram reel and the lyrics Great Balls of Fire, a song by Jerry Lee Lewis, followed by “Yall [I love DemocracyCraft! with] jerry lee lewis?” (See: P-010, P-008). III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract
According to the Contracts Act, “A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that creates an obligation to do or not do a particular thing.” “A valid contract is formed when the following legal test is met:
(a) Offer. An offer is a clear and unequivocal communication expressing a party's willingness to enter into a contract, either explicitly stated or reasonably inferred from the circumstances.
(b) Acceptance. Acceptance is the positive and unambiguous response to an offer communicated to the offeror, mirroring the terms of the offer and conveyed through various means.
(c) Consideration. Consideration, an essential element, involves the exchange of something of value between parties, with sufficiency though not necessarily adequacy. Consideration can be tangible or intanglbie.
(d) Intent. Parties must demonstrate a clear intention to create legal obligations for the contract to be valid.
(e) Capacity. Parties entering into a contract must possess the legal capacity to do so. Players with low playtime may lack the capacity to fairly enter a contract.” The contract between the Defendant and Plaintiff meet all 5 of these pillars. The Defendant offers graphic design services through his sole proprietorship, Hamster Corp. The contract covers the pillars of consideration and acceptance when the Plaintiff pays the upfront fee of 50% of the total after the Defendant requests it. There is obviously the intent of the Plaintiff to receive a poster design for the marketing of his brewery and the Defendant’s intent to deliver that when he keeps giving excuses for his delay in delivery. Capacity is met due to both parties having above 6 hours of total playtime. Also according to the Contracts Act, “A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations.” The Defendant broke this contract as soon as he repeatedly gave excuses for the failure to deliver both the poster and the refund once the Plaintiff requested one. The Defendant further displays the fact that he has broken the contract when he begins mocking and belittling the Plaintiff with emojis, stickers, Instagram reels, invitations to 8 Ball Pool games, and random song lyrics.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $2,000 in compensatory damages from the $2,000 that was sent as an upfront payment by the Plaintiff after being led to believe he would receive a poster design for his brewery.
2. $500 in punitive damages for the outrageous conduct of the Defendant that included making multiple excuses for failing to deliver the poster and later the refund, belittling, and mocking the Plaintiff.
3. $1,500 in consequential damages. According to the Legal Damages Act, a party can be awarded consequential damages if they have “been disgraced, belittled or made to look foolish”. The Plaintiff felt helpless when he was belittled by the Defendant when the Defendant sent emojis, stickers, Instagram reels, invitations to 8 Ball Pool games, and random song lyrics.
4. $2,000 in legal fees paid to 12700k, due to that being the minimum amount of legal fees allowed to be awarded, in the District Court, according to the Legal Damages Act.
V. WITNESSES
- Staff Team
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 3rd day of January 2026
