- Joined
- Mar 3, 2026
- Messages
- 144
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
melowy1,
Plaintiff
v.
hydra10794,
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
I. PARTIES
1. melowy1
2. hydra10794
II. FACTS
1. On 2 July 2026, Plaintiff rented yacht y001 and formed a sole-proprietorship known as OceanStakes ("P-001" & "P-002"). Oceanstakes was a gambling business meant to operate out of y001.
2. Plaintiff invested $1,050 into Oceanstakes ("P-003").
3. Shortly after founding Oceanstakes, Plaintiff invited Defendant to join Oceanstakes as an operating partner ("P-004").
4. Defendant invested $40 into Oceanstakes ("P-005").
5. Together, Plaintiff and Defendant had jointly operated Oceanstakes to a point where its corporate account which had accumulated $5,335.91 as of 6 July 2026 ("P-006").
6. On 6 July 2026, Defendant withdrew $5,335.91 on that day ("P-006").
7. On the same day, Defendant used his access to y001 to destroy Plaintiff's property ("P-007" & "P-008").
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Damage to Property under Section 1, Part VII, of the RCCA.
2. Conversion under Section 7, Part VII, of the RCCA. Conversion applies to this case through the wrongful taking of property from the Plaintiff to appropriate it to themselves or a third party. This wrongful taking was done through embezzlement which, under Section 6, Part VII, of the Criminal Code Act is defined as "fraudulently and knowingly misappropriates assets that have been entrusted to them... by virtue of... position of trust."
3. If conversion is found not to apply then, Unjust Enrichment under Section 1, Part X, of the RCCA.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $5,000 in compensatory damages for Damage to Property.
2. Treble damages for Conversion calculated with either of the following formals:
(a) If court finds Plaintiff is entitled to 100% of the funds within Oceangate minus the 40$, then $15,887.73 in treble damages.
(b) If court finds Plaintiff is entitled to the funds within Oceangate in proportion to both party's initial investment, then $15,420.29 in treble damages (rounded down to nearest cent).
(c) If court finds Plaintiff is entitled to 50% of the funds within Oceangate, then $8,003.87 in treble damages (rounded up to nearest cent).
3. In the event Conversion is found not to apply, $5,295.91 Unjust Enrichment.
4. $10,000 in consequential damages for Loss of Enjoyment.
5. $10,000 in punitive damages for outrageous conduct.
V. Witnesses
1. EmeraldGuuy
2. melowy1
3. Staff
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 7 July 2026