Lawsuit: Dismissed Melowy1 Lipdukasss v. Outk, BestBedrock777

[Dream8800]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

PLAINTIFF:
melowy1

By Counsel:
dream8800, Attorney for Plaintiff

v.

DEFENDANT:
Outk, BestBedrock777

CASE NO.: [To Be Assigned]

COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL DAMAGES, TRESPASS, PROPERTY DAMAGE, FLOODING DAMAGE, RESTITUTION, AND OTHER RELIEF​

I. INTRODUCTION​

Plaintiff melowy1, through counsel dream8800, files this civil action against Defendant outk for the intentional destruction and damage of Plaintiff's property.

This case concerns Defendant's deliberate actions that caused extensive damage to Plaintiff's apartment building, including explosive destruction and flooding damage throughout multiple areas of the property.

Defendant damaged Plaintiff's apartment building by destroying portions of the structure, including Floor 8, Floor 3, and apartments identified as lipap3-5, and by intentionally flooding a majority of Floor 7, including rooms identified as lipatp-18, lipatp-16, and lipatp-17.

The apartment building represented a substantial investment of time, labor, and in-game resources. The destroyed and flooded areas contained valuable construction materials, improvements, and property belonging to Plaintiff.

Defendant entered Plaintiff's property without permission and deliberately caused damage through explosive destruction and flooding. The resulting damage interfered with Plaintiff's ownership, possession, and use of the property.

Because of Defendant's actions, Plaintiff suffered financial losses, destruction of improvements, loss of property value, and additional expenses required to repair and restore the damaged areas.

Plaintiff requests that the Court hold Defendant responsible for all damages caused and award the relief requested below.

---

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE​

This Court has jurisdiction because the events described in this Complaint occurred within the Commonwealth of Redmont.

Venue is proper because the property involved in this dispute is located within Redmont and Defendant's actions occurred within the Commonwealth.

---

III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND​

Plaintiff lawfully owned and possessed the apartment building that is the subject of this action.

On or about 7/14/2026, Defendant entered Plaintiff's property without permission, authorization, or legal justification.

Defendant had no ownership interest, building rights, permission from Plaintiff, or lawful authority to enter, modify, destroy, or damage the property.

After entering the property, Defendant intentionally caused extensive damage to the apartment building.

Defendant's actions included:

1. Explosive destruction of Floor 8;
2. Explosive destruction of Floor 3;
3. Destruction of apartments identified as lipap3-5;
4. Flooding of a majority of Floor 7;
5. Flooding and damage to rooms identified as lipatp-18, lipatp-16, and lipatp-17.

The destruction and flooding were not accidental. The actions required deliberate conduct by Defendant and directly interfered with Plaintiff's lawful possession and use of the property.

The flooding caused damage to interior areas, disrupted the functionality of Floor 7, and created additional repair costs beyond the explosive damage.

Plaintiff did not consent to Defendant entering the property, placing explosives, causing destruction, or flooding any portion of the building.

As a direct result of Defendant's actions, Plaintiff must spend substantial time, labor, and resources restoring the damaged floors, rooms, and apartments.

Plaintiff has suffered economic damages, loss of property value, and loss of use of the property.

---

COUNT I​

PROPERTY DAMAGE​

Redmont Civil Code Act – Part VII §1

Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as though fully stated here.

Defendant intentionally caused damage to Plaintiff's property.

The apartment building, including Floor 8, Floor 3, apartments lipap3-5, Floor 7, and rooms lipatp-18, lipatp-16, and lipatp-17, belonged to Plaintiff and was under Plaintiff's lawful possession.

Defendant had no legal authority to destroy, flood, alter, or damage Plaintiff's property.

Defendant's explosive destruction and flooding directly caused damage to Plaintiff's building and improvements.

Under Part VII §1 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, Defendant is liable for the damages caused by the intentional destruction and damage of Plaintiff's property.

---

COUNT II​

TRESPASS​

Plaintiff incorporates all previous allegations.

Defendant knowingly entered Plaintiff's property without permission.

Defendant remained on the property and committed acts that interfered with Plaintiff's exclusive possession and ownership rights.

By entering the property and causing explosive destruction and flooding damage, Defendant unlawfully interfered with Plaintiff's use and enjoyment of the premises.

Defendant's unauthorized entry and actions constitute trespass under the laws of the Commonwealth of Redmont.

Plaintiff suffered damages directly resulting from Defendant's trespass.

---

COUNT III​

COMPENSATORY DAMAGES​

Plaintiff incorporates all previous allegations.

Defendant's actions caused Plaintiff significant financial and property-related harm.

Plaintiff's damages include, but are not limited to:

a. Repair and reconstruction of Floor 8;
b. Repair and reconstruction of Floor 3;
c. Restoration of apartments lipap3-5;
d. Removal of flood damage from Floor 7;
e. Restoration of rooms lipatp-18, lipatp-16, and lipatp-17;
f. Replacement of destroyed construction materials;
g. Restoration of structural and decorative features;
h. Replacement of damaged storage systems and infrastructure;
i. Labor required to rebuild and repair the property;
j. Loss of property value;
k. Loss of use and enjoyment of the property; and
l. Any additional losses established during these proceedings.

Plaintiff is entitled to recover compensatory damages sufficient to restore the property to the condition it was in before Defendant's actions.

---

​

DAMAGES​

Plaintiff estimates damages at $10,000 Redmontian Dollars, subject to adjustment if additional losses are discovered during the course of this action.

The damages include the cost of repairing explosive destruction, restoring flooded areas, rebuilding damaged apartments, replacing lost materials, and restoring the affected portions of the building.

Plaintiff has also incurred legal expenses in bringing this lawsuit and requests reimbursement of all recoverable attorney's fees, filing fees, and court costs.

---

PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff melowy1, through counsel dream8800, respectfully requests that the Court:

A. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant outk;

B. Find Defendant liable for intentional property damage under the Redmont Civil Code Act;

C. Find Defendant liable for trespass;

D. Award Plaintiff $10,000 (Ten Thousand Redmontian Dollars) as compensation for the destruction and flooding of Plaintiff's property, including Floor 8, Floor 3, apartments lipap3-5, Floor 7, and rooms lipatp-18, lipatp-16, and lipatp-17;

E. Order Defendant to reimburse Plaintiff for reasonable attorney's fees, filing fees, litigation expenses, and court costs;

F. Award additional restitution supported by evidence presented during proceedings;

G. Grant any further legal or equitable relief that the Court finds appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

ATTORNEY REPRESENTATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT​

View attachment 91042

Plaintiff:

melowy1
Date: 7/14/2026

Attorney:

dream8800
Attorney for Plaintiff melowy1
Date: 7/14/2026

 

[Dream8800]

COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, melowy1 and lipdukasss, by and through their authorized representative, Dream8800, and hereby voluntarily dismiss all claims asserted in this action against all Defendants. This dismissal is made on behalf of the Plaintiffs and is effective immediately upon filing. By this filing, the Plaintiffs request that the Court close this case and remove it from the active docket. This dismissal is made voluntarily and without further request for judicial relief in this matter.

 

[Dartanboy]

Court Order

The Court has restored the Original Complaint to ensure proper court records (the Plaintiff's counsel deleted it).

@Dream8800 is warned not to do so again, under penalty of Contempt of Court and/or Perjury depending on the nature of the violation.

Nonetheless, this case is dismissed without prejudice at request of the Plaintiffs.