Lawsuit: Pending Maxib02 V. DocTheory

[12700k]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Maxib02
Plaintiff

v.

DocTheory
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the night of June 29th into the morning of June 30th, I participated in a poker game on PokerNow.club, where I won a total of $11,124. Despite winning fair and square, the Defendant, DocTheory, has refused to pay the owed amount. When ATP Deputy Managing Partner, Talion77, reached out, the Defendant claimed that due to the commandeering of Voyager, he could not pay out the funds. However, he has ignored direct messages from myself and from others. I am seeking full compensation and additional damages to discourage similar misconduct in the future.

I. PARTIES
1. Plaintiff: Maxib02
2. Defendant: DocTheory

II. FACTS
1. Plaintiff participated in a poker game with the defendant on Pokernow.club on June 29–30 (See: P-002, P-004)
2. Plaintiff won a total of $11,124 (See: P-003, P-004)
3. Plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay the winnings (See: P-001)
4. Defendant claimed the Redmont Department of Commerce’s action of commandeering Voyager prevented payout (See: P-007)
5. Defendant was already notified that Voyager was commandeered by the Redmont Department of Commerce in an announcement sent by Avaneesh2008 in #government-announcements in the DemocracyCraft Discord server, 2 days before the poker game, on June 27th, yet decided to participate in the poker game anyway (See: P-005)
6. Defendant ignored follow-up messages from Maxib02 (See: P-006)
7. The Federal Court has acknowledged that casino betting practices are enforceable debts, in MegaMinerM v. Vortex [2024] FCR 90 stating “Casinos are offering a contract when they offer a chance to win money in exchange for money.” Plaintiff, Maxib02 and defendant, DocTheory entered into a contract when they participated in a poker game that involved "a chance to win money in exchange for money."

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant committed gambling fraud, §6 of the Commericial Standards Act, by refusing to pay out winnings from a poker game, misrepresenting the outcome and denying the Plaintiff their rightful earnings.
2. The Defendant may have engaged in embezzlement, §8 of the Commercial Standards Act, by withholding assets entrusted to them for payout and using those funds for personal gain.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $11,124 in compensatory damages owed from poker winnings
2. $3,000 in punitive damages to discourage these actions in the future
3. $4237.20 in legal fees, per the Legal Damages Act

V. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: P-007

VI. WITNESS LIST

1. Raitheguy
2. Jaja_thinks
3. Avaneesh2008

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 3rd day of July 2025

 

[12700k]

Your honor, I present proof of retainer with Maxib02.