Lawsuit: Pending lukeyyy v. Culls [2025] FCR 114

BrownBerry

Citizen
Congressional Staff
BrownBerry
BrownBerry
Draftsman
Joined
Aug 11, 2025
Messages
47

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


lukeyyy_ (represented by MZLD)
Plaintiff

v.

Culls
Defendant

COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
Culls agreed to a Sale Agreement. Culls then reneged on the agreement because they "had other plans". It's a cut and dry case.

I. PARTIES​

  1. lukeyyy_ (Plaintiff)
  2. Culls (Defendant)



II. FACTS​

  1. On 13 October, lukeyyy and lucaaasserole entered into negotiations to sell the World Marshals business to RaiTheGuy and Culls.
  2. On 15 October, lucaaasserole and lukeyyy offered to sell the World Marshals business, its Discord server and assets, and plot c261 to RaitTheGuy and Culls for $75,000 each (see P-001; the "Sale Agreement").
  3. All four parties signed the Sale Agreement, including Culls (see P-002).
  4. Culls has not paid the $75,000 owing under the Sale Agreement.
  5. Culls reneged on the Sale Agreement because he "had other plans" and told lukeyyy to "sue him" (see P-003).



III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF​

1. Breach of Contract​

Plainly, Culls breached the Sale Agreement by refusing to pay the $75,000 owing. This is an open and shut case. It should not require litigation. Culls admitted in P-003 that they have no defence to the claim.

By so openly refusing to comply with the Sale Agreement and inviting litigation, Culls' conduct was outrageous and requires punitive damages.

2. Breach of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (§14 of the Contracts Act)​

Plaintiff realleges Count 1. By refusing to comply with the terms of the Sale Agreement, and openly reneging upon it, Culls breached their duty of good faith and fair dealing under §14 of the Contracts Act. It is not good faith to negotiate an agreement and then renege upon it immediately without cause.

Again, this conduct is outrageous and requires punitive damages. Plaintiff claims only one-third of the value of the contract as punitive damages.




IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. An injunction requiring Culls to pay Plaintiff $75k under the Sale Agreement.
2. $25k in punitive damages for Culls outrageous conduct in opening reneging on the Sale Agreement.
3. Legal fees at the standard 30% rate ($30,000).




V. Evidence​



P-002.png

P-003.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

Dated this 27th day of October 2025.

 

Attachments

Back
Top