Bill: Draft Limitation Removal Act

How do you vote?

  • Sen: Aye

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sen: Nay

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sen: Abstain

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
  • This poll will close: .

End

Owner
Owner
Representative
Justice Department
xEndeavour
xEndeavour
Representative
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Messages
3,185
A
BILL
To

Amend the Constitution

The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law:

1 - Short Title and Enactment

(1) This Act may be cited as the 'Limitation Removal Act.'

(2) This Act shall be enacted immediately upon its signage.

(3) This Act has been authored by End.

(4) This Act has been co-sponsored by Talion

2 - Reasons

(1) Limits serve no purpose in the DCR and FCR, only restricting the growth of the legal field and the court's capacity to deal with business.

3 - Amendments

15. District‌ ‌Court‌ ‌of‌ ‌Redmont‌ ‌

The‌ ‌District‌ ‌Court‌ of Redmont ‌hears ‌all‌ ‌minor‌ ‌civil‌ ‌and‌ ‌criminal‌ ‌disputes‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌first‌ ‌instance.‌

(1) Presiding Officers. District Court cases are presided over by ‌a‌ ‌single‌ ‌Magistrate‌.‌ ‌

(2) Patronage. There‌ ‌shall‌ ‌not‌ ‌be‌ ‌more‌ ‌than‌ ‌three Magistrates ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌District Court of‌ ‌Redmont‌ at‌ ‌any‌ ‌given‌ ‌time.‌

‌...

17. Federal Court‌ ‌of‌ ‌Redmont‌ ‌
The‌ ‌Federal Court‌ ‌of‌ ‌Redmont‌ ‌hears‌ ‌all‌ ‌major‌ ‌civil‌ ‌and‌ ‌criminal‌ ‌disputes‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌first‌ ‌instance and is‌ ‌the‌ ‌appellate‌ ‌court‌ ‌for‌ ‌verdicts‌ ‌made‌ ‌by‌ ‌the‌ ‌District‌ ‌Courts‌.

(1) Presiding Officers. Federal Court cases are presided over by a single Judge.

(2) Patronage. There‌ ‌shall‌ ‌not‌ ‌be‌ ‌more‌ ‌than‌ ‌three Judges‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌Federal Court of‌ ‌Redmont‌ ‌at‌ ‌any‌ ‌given‌ ‌time.‌
 
Last edited:
The premise of the arguments ive heard so far is catastrophising that the president and legislative (two branches of government) are going to stack the court with 100s of their buddies - which is a departure from years of responsible nominations and confirmations.

This bill allows the court to expand and shrink as required and removes an arbitrary number limit from appointments.

If you use the argument that the court can be stacked with an unlimited amount of positions, then you are ignoring the fact that it can be stacked with a limited amount of positions.

If you have an executive and legislature compromised, they will just impeach out all of their non-buddies and appoint their buddies.There is no logical reason to maintain limits.
 
1763486320853.png

Bill need co sponzor
 
Back
Top