Lawsuit: Dismissed JoanM999 v. RockCod_1 [2021] SCR 17

Status
Not open for further replies.

Admin23

Citizen
Commerce Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Admin23
Admin23
economist
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
156
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTIONS

JoanM999 (TpersonH, Noalaloves, and Admin23 representing)
Plaintiff

v.

RockCod_1
Defendant

COMPLAINT
Plaintiff complains against Defendant as follows:
Defendant gave out free goods (e.g. Russian Vodka, Gasoline, etc.) to people who voted for the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates, 218218Consumer (hereinafter "Consumer") and GoldBlooded (hereinafter "Gold") respectively, which is a bribe to get people to vote for Consumer and Gold.

I. PARTIES
1. JoanM999 - Plaintiff
2. Admin23 - Counsel
3. Noalaloves - Co-counsel
4. TpersonH - Co-counsel
5. RockCod_1 - Defendant
6. 218218Consumer - Witness
7. nnmc - Witness

II. FACTS
1. RockCod_1 advertised in the Minecraft Server that his business would provide free Russian Vodka, Gasoline, Melons, and Netherack, and the free use of their shooting range for individuals who voted for the Consumer/Gold candidates in the Presidential Election and to incentivize and encourage voting for the Consumer/Gold campaign. (See Exhibit 6, 8 and 10)
2. RockCod_1 admitted in private messages in the Minecraft Server that he was bribing people to vote for the Consumer/Gold campaign. (See Exhibit 1, 2, and 3)
3. RockCod_1 confirmed in private messages in the Minecraft Server that Consumer supported the bribery taking place. (See Exhibit 4 and 5)
4. Consumer assisted the bribery taking place, encouraged it, and praised RockCod_1 in the Minecraft Server. He assisted RockCod_1's bribery by publicly supporting it which gives RockCod_1's bribery look official and give it legitimacy in the eyes of the people taking those bribes. (See Exhibit See Exhibit 6 and 8)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. It is a blatant and gross violation of election law to meddle in elections and bribe the electorate and it cheats the non-bribed voters of a legitimate say in the Government of Redmont through the sacred institution of voting established under our Constitution.
2. This sets a dangerous precedent for future elections if bribery and other such meddling goes unpunished and unnoticed.
3. The Executive Branch has already had time to implement changes and veto/assent to bills passed by Congress which is incredibly dangerous since they have not won the Office of President and Vice-President legitimately.
4. It is illegal to meddle with elections under Law 16.6 - Electoral Fraud "Any player caught rigging/messing with an election through, but not limited to: the use of alternate accounts, bribery, and or threats."
5. It is illegal to give assistance to perpetrators of a crime under Law 17.14 - Accessory to a Crime "Someone who gives assistance to the perpetrator of a crime without directly taking part in it."

IV. PRAYERS FOR RELIEF
1. RockCod_1 be fined $1,000 (one-thousand dollars) as allowed under law 16.6 - Electoral Fraud, and be barred from holding public office for 50 days.
2. Consumer be removed as President, and Gold be removed as Vice-President, and any other Offices under the Executive Branch that they have received after the Inauguration.
3. Consumer be barred from holding public office for 25 days.

V. WITNESSES:
1. 218218Consumer
2. nnmc

VI. EVIDENCE:
The Plaintiff hereby offers the following exhibits as evidence:

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury and should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 19th day of October, 2021.
 
As per the constitution,

"Only‌ ‌the‌ ‌Supreme‌ ‌Court‌ ‌shall‌ ‌hear‌ ‌cases‌ ‌that‌ ‌would‌ ‌remove‌ ‌a‌ ‌person/persons‌ ‌from‌ ‌the‌ ‌following‌ ‌
positions:‌ ‌Representatives,‌ ‌Secretary,‌ ‌Senator,‌ ‌Judge,‌ ‌Vice-President,‌ ‌Principal‌ ‌Officers,‌ ‌General‌ ‌Advisors,‌ ‌President.‌ ‌"

I shall be moving this case and assigning it to the Supreme Court Docket as the prayer for relief includes a request to remove a president and vice-president from their position.

**EDIT: I Thought this was posted in Federal Court**
 
After deliberations, the Supreme Court has unanimously decided to dismiss this case without prejudice.

The claims and contents of this case clearly involve the Plaintiff against RockCod_01, 218218Consumer, and GoldBlooded. Instead, the Plaintiff has filed this case solely against RockCod_01, and named 218218Consumer as a witness. If you are asking that the court removes 218218Consumer and GoldBlooded from office, they need to be named as Defendants. The current filing is deceptive and has disregard for the legal defence of both individuals who have not been named as Defendants.

In addition, the evidence presented in this case is not adequate enough to reasonably support the claims presented by the Plaintiff. Fact 4 claims that 218218Consumer assisted in the bribery, yet there is no evidence supporting that he assisted in bribery. The only evidence that we have found is effectively hearsay presented by RockCod_1, and at most, 218218Consumer praising RockCod_1 for support.

We believe that the standards of evidence for removing an individual for corruption should be higher than based on the word of another individual. There is no evidence in this case to link RockCod_1 to 218218Consumer committing corruption. The only evidence presented in mere he said vs she said situation.

The Court is highly disappointed with the egregious disregard for the law in filing this case. The claims for relief have no grounds when the Plaintiff has not named the Government or 218218Consumer as a Defendant, and the evidence presented is based purely on speculation of corruption.

Therefore we will be fining the Plaintiff's lawyers each $60 for a frivolous court case. If the Plaintiff and his counsel choose to re-file this case, we advise the Plaintiff to properly name the Defendants and provide relevant evidence to such a serious claim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top