Lawsuit: Pending Inalite v. Plura72 [2025] DCR 72

[Johnes]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Inalite
Plaintiff

v.

Plura72
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 5th of March, 2025, the Plaintiff sent a cease and desist letter to the Defendant (P-001), asking him to take down all campaign videos the defendant has made (P-002), which used a render of the Town of Aventura made by the Plaintiff (P-003). The cease and desist letter gave a reasonable time frame of 7 days in compliance with Section 7 of the Intellectual Property Act. The Defendant has complied with the request and has taken down the offending material posted before the cease and desist letter was sent.
On the 28th of September, 2025, the Defendant has posted the video in a DemocracyCraft Discord thread (P-004) and was warned by the Plaintiff of the cease and desist letter. The Defendant, instead of taking down the video, offered to buy the rights to the video (P-005) but was rejected. The video was not taken down and is still up, at the time of this filing.

I. PARTIES
1. Inalite - Plaintiff
2. Plura72 - Defendant

II. FACTS
1. On the 5th of March, 2025, the Defendant received a cease and desist letter from the Plaintiff.
2. The Defendant complied with the cease and desist letter and has taken down the offending videos, that were posted before the cease and desist letter was sent.
3. On the 28th of September, 2025, the Defendant posted the offending video into a DemocracyCraft Discord thread.
4. The Defendant was reminded of the cease and desist letter by the Plaintiff.
5. The Defendant offered to buy tge rights to the video, but the Plaintiff refused.
6. The Defendant has not removed the video at the time of this filing.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Copyright: The Defendant has knowingly used the Plaintiff's work for his campaign video without permission.
2. Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont: The Defendant, by his ignorant and domineering attitude, has caused the Plaintiff to lose enjoyment in playing on the server.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A public apology from the Defendant for his actions.
2. The offending video be taken down.
3. Consequential Damages for Loss of Enjoyment: The Plaintiff seeks $7500 from the Defendant for causing a loss of enjoyment.
4. Punitive Damages for the Defendant's outrageous behavior: The Plaintiff seeks $7500 from the Defendant for his outrageous behavior

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 4th day of October 2025.

P-001

Spoiler

P-002

Spoiler

https://imgur.com/a/kEvsW9G

P-003

Spoiler

P-004

Spoiler

P-005

Spoiler

Proof of Representation

Spoiler

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@Plura72 , is required to appear before the district Court in the case of Inalite v. Plura72

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Johnes]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The Plaintiff moves to request an emergency injunction to require the Defendant to delete all campaign videos (P-002) he's posted on Discord and refrain from posting new ones during the period of this trial.

 

[Muggy21]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER - [2025] DCR 72 (Inalite v. Plura72)

Granted, with modification.

1. Defendant shall remove the video specifically mentioned in P-004, if it is in part inclusive of P-002.
2. Defendant is enjoined from posting new iterations of works aforementioned in the Complaint until the end of the trial.

No part of this order will bar the Defendant from any campaigning, except for use of the material in controversy.