Lawsuit: Dismissed ImzaKRD v. Commonwealth [2025] FCR 130

[Imza]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

ImzaKRD
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honour,
The Legislative Standards Act explicitly states:

21 – Ethical Standards
(1) Members of Congress must recuse themselves from any investigations in which they may have a conflict of interest.
(2) Members of Congress cannot engage in questioning, proposing subpoenas, or any other investigative matter in which they have a conflict of interest.

On the 5th of December, at 3:52 AM GMT+03, Representative xEndeavour submitted the following motion [P-001]:

MOTION FOR HEARING

Congressional Accountability Hearing
Representative: DCT Secretary
Reason: Perceived inactivity within DCT leadership. No executive audits from this administration were received.

At approximately 9:13 AM GMT+03, Speaker of the House Talion77 placed the above motion up for a vote [P-002].

As stated in Section 21(1) and 21(2) of the Legislative Standards Act, Members of Congress are expressly prohibited from participating in any investigation in which they may hold a conflict of interest.

Representative xEndeavour has demonstrated repeated bias toward Secretary KattoAventura and the Department of Construction and Transportation, having led what several people have described as a “crusade” against the department’s leadership. Additionally, it has been observed by many individuals that xEndeavour is interested in regaining the role of DCT Secretary, a role he had previously held during the Kaiserin and Juniperfig Administrations. This creates a clear conflict of interest under the Act.

Despite this, Speaker Talion77 and Deputy Speaker Scassany have both failed to rule Motion [P-001] out of order, allowing a motion that violates the Legislative Standards Act to move to a vote.

IMMEDIATE AND IRREPARABLE HARM
Allowing the previously mentioned hearing to continue while a clear conflict of interest exists creates immediate harm. Once this hearing begins, it will be permanently tainted by this violation of the Legislative Standards Act. This harm cannot be undone by the Court in a later ruling, as the damage to the integrity of the hearing and to the Department of Construction and Transportation’s reputation would already have happened. Only an immediate halt can preserve fairness and ensure compliance with Section 21 of the Legislative Standards Act.

IMMEDIATE RELIEF REQUESTED:
A temporary halt to the Congressional Accountability Hearing against the Department of Construction and Transportation until the conclusion of this case.

Respectfully Submitted,
Imza A. Tempest,
Pro Se Litigant.

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

 

[Imza]

Your Honour,
This case was filed within the wrong thread; I ask that the Court move it to the Federal Court thread.

 

[Muggy21]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order - Dismissal, Want of Prosecution

Pursuant to the Judicial Standards Act § 18 (b), a litigant has 4 hours to produce a lawsuit if initiating a filing with an Emergency Injunction.

Plaintiff has failed to comply. He is found in Contempt of Court. Plaintiff shall be fined $1,000 and held in jail for 10 minutes. Case dismissed without prejudice.

So ordered,
Judge Mug.