Lawsuit: In Session I__4N v. cash2tuff [2026] DCR 51

[3mkTalal]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

I__4N
Plaintiff

v.

cash2tuff
Defendant

COMPLAINT



​

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On May 25, 2026, at approximately 8:07 AM in-game time, the Defendant, cash2tuff, aimed and/or attempted to fire a handgun at the Plaintiff, I__4N, near the airport. The Plaintiff was under new-player protection at the time, which prevented the Defendant’s conduct from causing actual physical damage. However, the Defendant still placed the Plaintiff in a position of danger by using a firearm against them.

The Plaintiff brings this civil action for damages arising from Assault under the Criminal Code Act.

I. PARTIES

1. I__4N, Plaintiff.
2. cash2tuff, Defendant.
3. 3mkTalal, legal representative for the Plaintiff.

II. FACTS

1. On May 25, 2026, at approximately 8:07 AM in-game time, the Plaintiff was near the airport.
2. The Defendant, cash2tuff, aimed and/or attempted to fire a handgun at the Plaintiff.
3. The Plaintiff was under new-player protection at the time of the incident.
4. Because of the Plaintiff’s new-player protection, the Plaintiff did not suffer actual health loss.
5. But for the Plaintiff’s new-player protection, the Defendant’s firearm conduct created a serious risk of death or substantial harm.
6. The Plaintiff did not consent to being threatened, aimed at, or fired upon.
7. The Defendant’s conduct placed the Plaintiff in a position of danger.
8. The incident caused the Plaintiff fear, distress, disruption, and loss of enjoyment while playing.
9. The Plaintiff has video evidence and supporting screenshots showing the Defendant’s conduct.
10. The Plaintiff has formally retained 3mkTalal / 3MK & Associates as legal counsel in this matter.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

CLAIM I: CIVIL DAMAGES ARISING FROM ASSAULT UNDER THE CRIMINAL CODE ACT

1. The Plaintiff brings this claim for civil damages arising from Assault under the Criminal Code Act.

2. Relevant Law: Criminal Code Act, Part IV, Section 1 - Assault:

“A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) intentionally hits another player, causing a loss of no more than 3 hearts; or
(b) places another player in a position of danger, including but not limited to pointing a weapon at them.”

3. The Defendant’s conduct satisfies subsection (b) because the Defendant aimed and/or attempted to fire a handgun at the Plaintiff.

4. The Plaintiff does not need to prove actual health loss under subsection (b), because subsection (b) is based on placing another player in a position of danger, including pointing a weapon at them.

5. Although new-player protection prevented actual physical damage, the Defendant’s conduct still created the danger contemplated by the Criminal Code Act.

CLAIM II: CIVIL DAMAGES ARISING FROM CRIMINAL CONDUCT UNDER THE REDMONT CIVIL CODE ACT

6. Relevant Law: Redmont Civil Code Act, Part III, Section 1 - Applicability:

“The definitions and rules for damages in this Part apply to all civil matters under this Code, including claims for civil damages arising from criminal conduct.”

7. The Plaintiff is not asking this Court to criminally punish the Defendant. The Plaintiff is asking for civil damages based on the Defendant’s criminal conduct toward the Plaintiff.

CLAIM III: NOMINAL DAMAGES UNDER THE REDMONT CIVIL CODE ACT

8. The Plaintiff seeks nominal damages.

9. Relevant Law: Redmont Civil Code Act, Part III, Section 4 - Nominal Damages:

“Nominal damages are a trivial sum of money given as recognition that a legal cause of action has been established, even though the plaintiff has suffered no substantial loss and is not entitled to any other damages.”

10. Relevant Law: Redmont Civil Code Act, Part III, Section 4 - Award:

“Nominal damages shall not exceed $7,500.”

11. The Plaintiff has established a legal cause of action because the Defendant’s conduct constituted Assault by placing the Plaintiff in a position of danger.

12. Because the Plaintiff did not suffer a specific calculable financial loss, nominal damages are appropriate to recognize the legal harm caused by the Defendant’s conduct.

CLAIM IV: PUNITIVE DAMAGES UNDER THE REDMONT CIVIL CODE ACT

13. The Plaintiff seeks punitive damages.

14. Relevant Law: Redmont Civil Code Act, Part III, Section 3 - Punitive Damages:

“Punitive damages are damages awarded against a person to punish them for their outrageous conduct and to deter them and others like them from similar conduct in the future.”

15. Relevant Law: Redmont Civil Code Act, Part III, Section 3 - Award:

“Punitive damages will not be awarded unless they are either authorised by statute or unless the conduct of the other party in causing the party’s harm is outrageous.”

16. Relevant Law: Redmont Civil Code Act, Part III, Section 3 - Outrageous Conduct:

“Outrageous conduct means conduct that demonstrates a substantial departure from acceptable standards of behaviour and reflects a wilful, dishonest, oppressive, reckless, or grossly negligent disregard for the rights, interests, or safety of others.”

17. The Defendant’s conduct was outrageous because the Defendant aimed and/or attempted to fire a handgun at the Plaintiff, creating a serious risk of death or substantial harm.

18. The only reason physical damage did not occur was the Plaintiff’s new-player protection.

19. The Defendant’s conduct therefore demonstrates reckless disregard for the Plaintiff’s safety and justifies punitive damages.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant:

1. $1,000 in nominal damages for the Defendant placing the Plaintiff in danger through Assault.
2. $1,500 in punitive damages for the Defendant’s reckless disregard for the Plaintiff’s safety.
3. Total damages of $2,500.
4. Any applicable legal fees awarded to the prevailing party.
5. Any other relief the Court finds just and proper.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: Video evidence showing the Defendant aiming and/or attempting to fire a handgun at the Plaintiff near the airport.

Untitled - Clipped Minecraft with Medal.tv
P-002: Screenshot(s) from the video showing the Defendant with the handgun and the Plaintiff near the airport.

Spoiler: P-002: Screenshot(s) from the video showing the Defendant with the handgun and the Plaintiff near the airport.

Spoiler: P-003: Screenshot or statement showing that the Plaintiff was under new-player protection.

VI. WITNESSES

1. I__4N
Expected testimony: The Plaintiff may testify about the Defendant aiming and/or firing a handgun, the Plaintiff’s new-player protection, the location near the airport, and the fear, distress, disruption, and loss of enjoyment caused by the incident.

VII. APPENDIX

1. The Criminal Code Act defines Assault as placing another player in a position of danger, including but not limited to pointing a weapon at them.
2. The Redmont Civil Code Act allows civil damages arising from criminal conduct.
3. The Redmont Civil Code Act allows nominal damages where a legal cause of action is established even without substantial loss.
4. The Redmont Civil Code Act allows punitive damages where the Defendant’s conduct is outrageous, including reckless disregard for the safety of others.
5. The District Court guide requires a lawyer representing a client to provide evidence that the client officially retained them.
6. The Court template requires parties, facts, claims for relief, prayer for relief, evidence, witnesses if applicable, and the perjury statement.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

The Plaintiff is represented by 3mkTalal of 3MK & Associates. Proof of representation is attached as evidence.

Spoiler: Proof of representation

DATED: This 25th day of May 2026

 

[Franciscus]

Writ of Summons

Cash2tuff is ordered to appear before the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in the case of I__4N v. cash2tuff [2026] DCR 51.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.