- Joined
- Jun 25, 2026
- Messages
- 45
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Gavy
Plaintiff
v.
Rafa_LIT4
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. Gavy
2. Rafa_LIT4
II. FACTS
1. On or about 10:00 PM EST on the July 29th, 2026, Rafa_LIT4 uploaded an ad stating the following. “Attention GAVY! i will KILL YOU for not paying me 12 bucks before killing MY employee,” as seen in P-001.
2. On or about 10:00 PM EST on the July 29th, 2026, Rafa_LIT4 sent a message to Gavy stating that “gavy, i have a head that SAYS killed by gavy, pay me 12 bucks which is the price for killing my employees and i will let u go. ALTHOUGH! we currently have a offer, 50 percent off for killing a core industries employee!” This can be seen in P-002.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Malicious Allegation (RCCA under Part XIII § 5)
According to the RCCA, a person commits Malicious Allegation when one:
(a) makes a false allegation that another person committed a crime or civil violation; and
(b) knew or could reasonably infer that the allegation was false; and
(c) the allegation causes harm to the accused person’s reputation, livelihood, or wellbeing.
Notably as well, the RCCA notes that this violation shall not occur where:
(d) the allegation was substantially true; or
(e) the person had reasonable grounds to believe the allegation was true; or
(f) the allegation was made in good faith to the appropriate authorities for investigation.
We, as the Plaintiffs, believe that these facts have been met for the following reasons:
I. A False Allegation was Made.
The Plaintiff in this case asserts and will testify that he did not murder any supposed employee of the Defendant's company. The Plaintiff in this case has a clean criminal record and as of today's date has never been charged with any counts of murder on any grounds.
II. The Defendant could reasonably infer that the Allegation was false.
The Defendant in the proceedings of this case may try to present proof that he would have reasonable grounds to believe the allegation was true, but according to the statements made by the Defendant, the Plaintiff finds it difficult to believe that to be the case.
While the Defendant claims that they were in possession of a head attributing the Plaintiff in this case of being an assailant, such proof will need to be brought before this court after the Defendant is summoned. This being done, the Plaintiff also believes that a head alone is not enough proof to build a reasonable allegation to be stated for the truth of the matter. Heads can be dropped in cases of self-defense. Thus, the appropriate avenue for the reasonable suspicion created by the head was for the Defendant to report such to the proper authorities. It should not have been to broadcast a death threat to the entire server via a /ad accusing the Plaintiff of a murder.
III. The Allegation caused harm to the accused person's livelihood and wellbeing.
As was stated in the above response in post #8, the Defendant's actions caused harm to the accused person's livelihood and wellbeing.
Whereas the nature of such a statement made in the form of a /ad is broadcasted to the entire server, the Plaintiff felt the need to seek legal counsel and had to, for a period of three days, cease business operations in discussion about his rights in this case. Since the Plaintiff at the time was a new player to the server, the statement caused the Plaintiff losses as he had to hire legal counsel in the amount of $1,500 to see what could be done about the matter. (See P-004)
Additionally, as seen in the provided transactional evidence, (P-005) the plaintiff's business, (BackywoodBoyzCo.), now makes around $12,500k in net profit a month on average. Witness KorroMF, who developed the bot pictured in the screenshot, will be testifying to the nature of the statistics bot, to establish it as a reliable source of information that cannot be edited from an external source. Additional screenshots can be submitted though from in-game sources should the court require it.
Since the nature of having to hire and confer with legal counsel required the Plaintiff to delay the building of his business for three days, as will be testified to by our witnesses, this indirectly hampered their ability to turn a profit sooner, in effect hindering them from three additional days of profit. If this monthly profit is divided by thirty-one that results in approximately $1,200 in damages for the three-day period, since no profit was made during the period as the plaintiff was hindered in his ability to finish setting up his business by having to confer with legal counsel.
On the matter of wellbeing, the Plaintiff in this case will testify and reasonably would conclude that he had reason to fear for his safety as the Defendant was threatening to "Kill" the Plaintiff on the grounds of his alleged murder.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A Court Order for the public retraction of the accusatory statement.
2. $2,700 in Compensatory Damages, to reimburse the Plaintiff for the losses incurred in the issue of this case.
3. $7,500 in Nominal Damages, to recognize the legal action that has been taken.
4. $15,000 in Consequential Damages, on the basis of Worsening of Conditions.
5. $15,000 in Consequential Damages, on the basis of Loss of Enjoyment.
6. $25,000 in Punitive Damages due to the outrageous nature of the Defendant's conduct.
7. $19,560 in Legal Fees, or 30% of the award actually granted if the plaintiff prevails, per Part III § 7 of the RCCA.
For ease of calculation on the part of the Magistrate in this case, the total amount sought for relief in this case totals $84,760.00.
Witnesses:
1. KorroMF
2. PeekDaWindows
3. Gavy
Evidence:
“Attention GAVY! i will KILL YOU for not paying me 12 bucks before killing MY employee”
gavy, i have a head that SAYS killed by gavy, pay me 12 bucks which is the price for killing my employees and i will let u go. ALTHOUGH! we currently have a offer, 50 percent off for killing a core industries employee!
To: Rafa_LIT4
From: The Law Offices of SingeHeart, Addams & Associates
Good evening. My name is Jacob Wolfe, aka SniperElite508. I am sending this letter on behalf of my client, Gavy. Gavy has approached us with the intent to file charges against you for the following infractions committed on July 29, 2026 in the Minecraft server, Democracy Craft:
1. One (1) count of Defamation.
2. One (1) count of Slander.
3. One (1) count of Nuisance.
Gavy has presented adequate evidence to file said charges including but not limited to:
1. Screenshots proving both Slander and Defamation.
2. Additional screenshots proving Nuisance.
These charges are indictable crimes according to the Criminal Code Act of Redmont and, should the courts punish you to the fullest extent of our requests, it would result in the following fines and orders:
1. A court order for a public retraction of the Defamatory/Slanderous statement.
2. A court order for the Defendant to abate the aforementioned Nuisance by requiring him to refrain from broadcasting further defamatory/slanderous statements on the server, but in particular about Gavy, his intellectual property, and any of his associates or businesses.
3. $3,000 in Civil Penalty units for the charge of Nuisance.
4. $3,000 in legal fees as outlined by the minimal legal fee requirements in Part III §7 of the RCCA.
In short, this letter is a notice for the following:
1. This is a Cease-and-Desist notice for the player Rafa_LIT4 to cease and desist his use of Gavy's name in further public communication pertaining to any breach of contract transaction between Gavy and Rafa_LIT4. The use of Gavy's name in this way violates the RCCA on the basis of Trademark law. Gavy's name is a recognizable expression used to identify both his business and services that he offers and Rafa_LIT4's use of Gavy's name in Rafa's /ad was not for purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting, and/or teaching, but rather defamation and/or slander.
An affirmation here that such action will not be done again will be enough to meet the requirements of this Cease and Desist, provided that this infringement is not committed again.
2. Beyond this, the plaintiff requests that a public apology be made on the server for your false accusations raised against Gavy on the 29th of July, 2026. The plaintiff requests that a message be made to global chat stating the following: (1) Gavy had not refused to pay you $12, as you had not informed him of any charge before making an ad in chat, and (2) that Gavy had not murdered your employee wrongfully as he was acting in self-defense. After making such apology on global chat, please upload a screenshot here.
Upon delivery of this official notice, you will have 24 hours to respond. You may meet the requirements of your cease-and-desist letter by following the demands of the first point. Any charges related to Trademark Infringement will be dropped upon the fulfillment of the first point. All charges shall be dropped should both points be met. The charges of Defamation and/or Slander would be re-raised should an apology be made but further Defamation and/or Slander persits nonetheless. Additionally, should a promise to cease and desist be made here but is not kept, the charges pertaining to your infringement of trademark shall be re-raised. Should we not receive a response for all or part of this notice/cease-and-desist letter within this time frame, we will assume you have rejected this offer, whether in whole or in part, and will proceed to file the respective charges against you according to the terms outlined above.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Regards,
- Jacob Wolfe, aka SniperElite508
- The Law Offices of SingeHeart, Addams & Associates
From: The Law Offices of SingeHeart, Addams & Associates
Good evening. My name is Jacob Wolfe, aka SniperElite508. I am sending this letter on behalf of my client, Gavy. Gavy has approached us with the intent to file charges against you for the following infractions committed on July 29, 2026 in the Minecraft server, Democracy Craft:
1. One (1) count of Defamation.
2. One (1) count of Slander.
3. One (1) count of Nuisance.
Gavy has presented adequate evidence to file said charges including but not limited to:
1. Screenshots proving both Slander and Defamation.
2. Additional screenshots proving Nuisance.
These charges are indictable crimes according to the Criminal Code Act of Redmont and, should the courts punish you to the fullest extent of our requests, it would result in the following fines and orders:
1. A court order for a public retraction of the Defamatory/Slanderous statement.
2. A court order for the Defendant to abate the aforementioned Nuisance by requiring him to refrain from broadcasting further defamatory/slanderous statements on the server, but in particular about Gavy, his intellectual property, and any of his associates or businesses.
3. $3,000 in Civil Penalty units for the charge of Nuisance.
4. $3,000 in legal fees as outlined by the minimal legal fee requirements in Part III §7 of the RCCA.
In short, this letter is a notice for the following:
1. This is a Cease-and-Desist notice for the player Rafa_LIT4 to cease and desist his use of Gavy's name in further public communication pertaining to any breach of contract transaction between Gavy and Rafa_LIT4. The use of Gavy's name in this way violates the RCCA on the basis of Trademark law. Gavy's name is a recognizable expression used to identify both his business and services that he offers and Rafa_LIT4's use of Gavy's name in Rafa's /ad was not for purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting, and/or teaching, but rather defamation and/or slander.
An affirmation here that such action will not be done again will be enough to meet the requirements of this Cease and Desist, provided that this infringement is not committed again.
2. Beyond this, the plaintiff requests that a public apology be made on the server for your false accusations raised against Gavy on the 29th of July, 2026. The plaintiff requests that a message be made to global chat stating the following: (1) Gavy had not refused to pay you $12, as you had not informed him of any charge before making an ad in chat, and (2) that Gavy had not murdered your employee wrongfully as he was acting in self-defense. After making such apology on global chat, please upload a screenshot here.
Upon delivery of this official notice, you will have 24 hours to respond. You may meet the requirements of your cease-and-desist letter by following the demands of the first point. Any charges related to Trademark Infringement will be dropped upon the fulfillment of the first point. All charges shall be dropped should both points be met. The charges of Defamation and/or Slander would be re-raised should an apology be made but further Defamation and/or Slander persits nonetheless. Additionally, should a promise to cease and desist be made here but is not kept, the charges pertaining to your infringement of trademark shall be re-raised. Should we not receive a response for all or part of this notice/cease-and-desist letter within this time frame, we will assume you have rejected this offer, whether in whole or in part, and will proceed to file the respective charges against you according to the terms outlined above.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Regards,
- Jacob Wolfe, aka SniperElite508
- The Law Offices of SingeHeart, Addams & Associates
"BUSINESS >> Paid $1,000 into SHAAssociates"
"BUSINESS >> Paid $500 into SHAAssociates"
"BackwoodBoysCo Sales"
"Period: Month"
"Revenue | Items Sold | Transactions"
"$12,633.38 | 135,040 | 7171"
"Customers | Avg. Sale"
"92 | $1.76"
"I, Gavy, am willing to have @SniperElite508 represent me in all matters pertaining to this case.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 20th day of September, 2026