Lawsuit: Pending Fukunishiki v .CrownedWitness [2026] DCR 108

[PostOfficeTower]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

fukunishiki
Plaintiff

-v-

.CrownedWitness
Defendant

COMPLAINT
Plaintiff alleges that on the 25th June 2026 on or around 10:30 AM UTC the Plaintiff met the Defendant in the town of Aventura to arrange for the purchase and collection of 10 stacks of Diamonds in exchange for DC$1,800. On receipt of the money the Defendant then seemingly went away from their keyboard and then left their meeting without handing over the Diamonds as promised. Plaintiff then challenged the Defendant on the fact they did not supply the Diamonds as promised, Defendant said: “what u gonna do about it??” and upon being accused of criminality, Defendant then said: “the whole server knows that, why you think no one else bought lol?”. Some time after that the Defendant then said in Global chat: “@here guys I scammed fukunishiki lol hehehe @here I scammed him with diamonds [...] how ridiculous does that sound”

I. PARTIES

1. Fukunishiki, Plaintiff
2. .CrownedWitness, Defendant

II. FACTS

1. The Defendant advertised the sale of Diamonds for $2,800 using the /ad command (P-001).
2. The Plaintiff then reached out and the negotiated on the price with the Defendant (P-002, P-003)
3. Defendant then confirmed the agreed upon price of $1,800 in exchange for 10 stacks of diamonds and then invited the Plaintiff to Aventura to collect (P-004).
4. Plaintiff then further confirmed the agreed upon exchange, which the Defendant agreed upon and Plaintiff then paid Defendant $1,800 (P-005).
5. Defendant then went AFK, stating “sorry I had to help my mom” when asked for the diamonds by Plaintiff (P-006) and immediately transferred the Plantiffs funds out of his personal balance (P-012)
6. Plaintiff pressed the issue further, Defendant then stated “what u gonna do about it??” (P-007), when Plaintiff accused Defendant of criminal conduct, Defendant stated: “the whole server knows that, why u think no one else bought lol?” (P-008)
7. Plaintiff then demanded a refund from the Defendant to the order of $1,800 (P-009). Defendant then refused to issue a refund, stating “Na i really don’t wanna [...] I’ma log off for a bit” (P-010)
8. At an unknown time on the same day, the Defendant logged back on to the server and gloated: “@here guys I scammed fukunishiki lol hehehe @here I scammed him with diamonds” and “how ridiculous does that sound” (P-011)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Defendant engaged in a breach of contract pursuant to Part VI §1 of the Redmont Civil Code for the delivery of goods to the Plaintiff.
2. This fact, by its very nature, also gives rise to a claim that the Defendant failed to provide goods and services pursuant to Part VI §4 of the Redmont Civil Code.
3. That the Defendants conduct gives rise to a claim of Misrepresentation per Part VI §2 and that this also constitutes a breach of the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing under §12 of the Contracts Act
4. That all of this combined, constitutes Conversion per Part VII §7 because Defendant has withheld property from Plaintiff wrongfully, and in doing so intended to deprive the owner, and that this was committed by obtaining property by false promise pursuant to a scheme to defraud, and through deception, lies, false statements, and false pretences.
5. That Defendant has admitted that he knowingly and consciously defrauded Plaintiff in an attempt to belittle my client, this meets the criteria of Humiliation pursuant to Part III, §5(i) of the Redmont Civil Code.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. Restitution to the order of 10 stacks of Diamonds as promised, or $1,800 of compensatory damages if the Court does not find the Defendant liable for conversion.
2. If the Defendant is found liable for conversion, Plaintiff seeks triple damages to the order of $5,400.
3. In addition to this, Plaintiff seeks punitive damages of $10,000.
4. Any other relief this honourable court sees fit to grant.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 29th day of June 2026

 

[PostOfficeTower]

Proof of representation

 

[PostOfficeTower]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The plaintiff moves that an Emergency Injunction be issued in this case, in order to:

1. Freeze the Defendant's assets for the duration of this case.
   
   This would act to prevent the obfuscation of his assets, and would also serve to allow for the recovery of assets in the event of a judgement against Defendant without difficulty, the Defendants reluctance to repay my client may persist even in the face of a court order, as is seen in Exhibit P-012

 

[PostOfficeTower]

Filing edited in order to correct a small, but very consequential, clerical error.

 

[Muggy21]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The plaintiff moves that an Emergency Injunction be issued in this case, in order to:

1. Freeze the Defendant's assets for the duration of this case.
   
   This would act to prevent the obfuscation of his assets, and would also serve to allow for the recovery of assets in the event of a judgement against Defendant without difficulty, the Defendants reluctance to repay my client may persist even in the face of a court order, as is seen in Exhibit P-012

Granted with a modification.

1) The DHS shall seize the 10 stacks of diamonds in question.

In the alternative, DHS shall seize $1800 for safekeeping.

 

[PostOfficeTower]

​

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The plaintiff moves that an Emergency Injunction be issued in this case, in order to:

1. Compel Staff to turn over the Plantiff's transaction records for the 25th June on or around 10:30 AM Universal Coordinated Time. The transaction in question is the one directly after Plaintiff transferred $1,800 to Defendant.
   
   This would serve to identify the individual that the funds were transferred to as seen in P-012, this individual is potentially a party to proceedings and may be joindered or called to testify at a later date - or, it may result in the provisions of the EI in relation to assets, extending in the event plaintiff turns out to be an alternative account of the individual in question.

 

[Muggy21]

​

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The plaintiff moves that an Emergency Injunction be issued in this case, in order to:

1. Compel Staff to turn over the Plantiff's transaction records for the 25th June on or around 10:30 AM Universal Coordinated Time. The transaction in question is the one directly after Plaintiff transferred $1,800 to Defendant.
   
   This would serve to identify the individual that the funds were transferred to as seen in P-012, this individual is potentially a party to proceedings and may be joindered or called to testify at a later date - or, it may result in the provisions of the EI in relation to assets, extending in the event plaintiff turns out to be an alternative account of the individual in question.

This isn’t an emergency injunction request, denied.