Bill: Vote Fluff Regulation Act

How do you vote?

  • Rep: Abs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sen: Aye

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sen: Nay

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sen: Abs

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8
  • This poll will close: .

Angryhamdog

Happy to help :)
Senior Administrator
Representative
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
Homeland Security Department
Education Department
Commerce Department
5th Anniversary Change Maker Staff Popular in the Polls
Angryhamdog
Angryhamdog
Representative
Joined
Jan 2, 2025
Messages
582
CONGRESS OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT






A BILL TO

Update the list of Illegal Substances







The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law:


PART I — PRELIMINARIES

1. Short Title and Enactment


(1) This Act may be cited as the 'Fluff Regulation Act'

(2) This Act shall be enacted immediately upon its signage.

(3) This Act has been authored by Angryhamdog.

(4) This Act has been co-sponsored by Senator EATB.

(5) This Act amends the following acts:

(a) Criminal Terminology Act

(6) This Act repeals the following acts:

(a) Substance Autonomy Act

2. Reasons and Intent

(1) Most 'illicit substances' do not currently exist. The only one we currently (maybe) have is fluff.

(2) The Substance Autonomy Act is outdated and the lack of buffs creates a lack of a reason to have town rights in relations to substance licenses.


PART II — Amendments

3. Criminal Terminology Act Amendments


(1) The Criminal Terminology Act shall be amended as follows:

4 - Illicit Substances

(b) The Following Substances are deemed illicit.

(i) Fluff

(i) Quix

(ii) Tyalus Erthro

(iii) Meep

(iv) Fuchsin

(v) Hite

(vi) Sleepitol

(vii) Lerf

(iix) Ermiya

(ix) Glisp

(x) Azamath



4. Transitional Terms

(1) Citizens shall be given a time period of 14 days from the signing of this bill to hand in any new illicit substances to the Department of Homeland Security, and will not be charged for the Possession of such substances until that time.
 
Last edited:
:nay: - I think I speak for everyone, including bananabread, but fluff is just too good to make illegal. I would like to see fluff handed to new players in lieu of the $1200 payment.

Give a new player a stack of fluff and watch them become millionaires.

The benefits of fluff FAR outweigh the consequences or negative effects.
1772231797520.png

(I wrote this high on fluff)

In spite of this, you (the Representative reading this) should vote :aye: for the other benefits of this Act itself, specifically removing the redundant illicit substances.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top