Lawsuit: Pending fionaapplism v. Pikaonly [2026] DCR 171

[ameslap]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
COMPLAINT

fionaapplism
Plaintiff

v.

Pikaonly
Defendant

COMPLAINT

On or around August 21, Pikaonly attempted to purchase 2 separate plots that fionaapplism had for sale. After the sale did not go through, Pikaonly connected the refusal to sell with threats to contact inspectors and authorities that illegal drugs were located on the property.

There were no drugs on the property. The accusations and threats of reports caused fionaapplism to be concerned that their property was under threat and that they themselves would be subject to an investigation. Pikaonly used allegations of criminal activity as leverage after fionaapplism refused to sell their properties.

I. PARTIES
1. fionaapplism, Plaintiff.
2. Pikaonly, Defendant.

II. FACTS
1. On or around August 21, the Defendant placed an $85,000 offer to purchase plot s135. (P-001)
2. On or around August 21, the Defendant placed an $85,000 offer to purchase plot s134. (P-001)
3. The Plaintiff did not accept or complete a sale on either plot.
4. 8 minutes after, the Defendant stated “Well then, I’m going to contact some inspectors for that eyesore report since u didnt close the bottom part. And the illegal dru5s on some of ur floors :3”. (P-001)
5. The Defendant connected the threatened inspection and allegation of drugs with the Plaintiff’s refusal to sell the plots.
6. The Defendant continued alleging that illegal plants were located within the Plaintiff’s property. (P-002)
7. The Plaintiff inspected the property and found no illegal drugs or plants.
8. The Defendant's allegations and threats caused the Plaintiff concern and distress regarding the possibility of inspection, criminal accusation, and interference with her property.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Malicious Allegation
Under the Redmont Civil Code Act, Part XIII, Section 5, a person commits Malicious Allegation where that person makes a false allegation that another committed a crime or violation, knew or could reasonably infer that the allegation was false, and causes harm to the accused person’s reputation, livelihood, or well-being.

The Defendant alleged that illegal drugs or illegal plants were located on the Plaintiff’s property.

The Plaintiff denies the allegation and, upon inspection of the property, found no such drugs or plants.

The circumstances support the reasonable inference that these accusations were not made in good faith. The Defendant made them immediately after the Plaintiff did not sell their properties and expressly stated that inspectors would be contacted “since u didnt close.”

The accusations harmed the Plaintiff's well-being by instilling fear and concern about a potential investigation and criminal accusations.

Conspiracy to Commit Extortion
Under the Criminal Code Act, Part X, Section 14, Conspiracy to Commit a Crime occurs where a person intends to commit a crime even where the principal crime has not yet been carried out.

Extortion happens when a person compels or induces another to deliver funds or property by instilling fear that the person will, among many other things, accuse a person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted.

The Defendant tried to purchase 2 plots from the Plaintiff.

After the Plaintiff did not close the transaction, the Defendant threatened to contact inspectors regarding alleged illegal drugs, stating that this would occur “since u didnt close.”

Because the Plaintiff did not transfer the property, the Plaintiff does not allege completed Extortion. Instead, the Defendant's messages demonstrate an intent to use threatened criminal accusations or investigation to induce the Plaintiff to transfer property, constituting Conspiracy to Commit Extortion.

This is consistent with two separate cases involving Extortion. The first being [2026] DCR 53, where the Court found that no damages of extortion were available since the property demanded was never transferred.

The second is [2026] FCR 34, where the Defendant was charged and found guilty of Conspiracy to Commit Extortion after the Defendant induced fear after a failure to sign an agreement with another player.

III. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff requests the following:
1. $10,000 in punitive damages;
2. $7,500 in nominal damages;
3. Legal Fees

By making this submission, I agree that I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

WITNESS LIST
The Plaintiff calls the following witnesses:
1. Fionaaplism, Plaintiff
2. The Attorney General or their designee.
3. The Secretary of Homeland Security or their Designee

EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

DATED: This 22nd Day of September 2026.

Spoiler: Representation