Lawsuit: Pending eviltom_ v. dogkoja

[eviltom_]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

eviltom_
Plaintiff

v.
dogkoja
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

-----

eviltom_ won and paid for an auction in a #marketplace thread for a "Custom Portrait" from dogkoja for $11,000. dogkoja has not responded since.

-----

I. PARTIES

1. eviltom_ (Plaintiff)
2. dogkoja (Defendant)

II. FACTS

1. On the 25th of July 2026, dogkoja listed an auction in #marketplace named "CUSTOM PORTRAITS - your skin here -->" (P-001).
2. On the 28th of July 2026 dogkoja informed eviltom_ he had won the auction for $11,000 and eviltom_ sent payment to dogkoja in the auction thread (P-002).
3. dogkoja then sent a message in the thread to verify eviltom_'s skin, which eviltom_ confirmed (P-003).` dogkoja then acknowledged eviltom_'s confirmation (P-004).
4. On the 5th of August 2026, eviltom_ asked for a progress update in the #marketplace auction thread (P-005).
5. dogkoja did not respond (P-005).
6. On the 10th of August 2026, eviltom_ sent a DM on discord asking "Hey, just wondering if you're done with DC? nbd but if you're not gonna do portrait could I get a refund?" (P-006).
7. dogkoja did not respond (P-006).
8. On the 15th of August 2026, eviltom_ sent dogkoja the following /mail in-game "Hey, just reaching out to say, If you don't fulfill your end of the contract, or agree to refund the $11k, I will be suing you for the $11k and more. Happy to settle this in the next 72 hours. Thanks." (P-007).
9. dogkoja did not respond.
10. eviltom_ has attempted and been unable to contact dogkoja about the fulfillment & settlement of their contract.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Breach of Contract​

The Redmont Civil Code Act defines the civil violation of Breach of Contract as a strict liability violation as follows:

A person commits a violation if the person:
(a) fails to perform obligations under a valid and enforceable contract without lawful excuse.
This violation shall not occur where:
(b) the contract is void or voidable; or
(c) performance was rendered impossible by circumstances beyond the party’s control; or
(d) the other party materially breached the contract first; or
(e) the party was induced to enter the contract through misrepresentation or duress.

(RCCA, Part VI, Section 1).

Through bidding on Defendant's auction and winning the auction, a Contract was formed between Plaintiff and Defendant.
According to Section 4(2) of the Contracts Act, the formation of a Contract requires:

1. Offer, in this case the Plaintiff offered $11,000 in exchange for Defendant's auction by posting the message reading "11k" to the Auction thread (P-002).
2. Acceptance, the Defendant accepted Plaintiff's offer by announcing them as the winner of the Auction (P-002).
3. Consideration, it is clear that there is an exchange of value between parties, consisting of the exchange of $11,000 for the service of creating a custom portrait.
4. Intent, the actions of both parties in the auction thread (P-001, P-002, P-003, P-004) clearly demonstrate the intent of both parties to come to an exchange of the $11,000 for the finished custom portrait.
5. Capacity, each Party had the Capacity to enter into such a Contract. Both parties had reached more than 6 hours of playtime prior to engaging in this contract.

By not completing the service the Plaintiff is owed, Defendant failed to fulfill their Contractual Obligations and thereby caused a Breach of Contract pursuant Section 7(1) of the Contracts Act. Under paragraph (a) of this subsection, specific performance is determined to be one of the available remedies for a Breach of Contract.

2. Failure to Deliver Goods or Services​

Under the Redmont Civil Code Act, the tort of Failure to Deliver Goods or Services is as follows:

A person commits a violation if the person:
(a) fails without lawful excuse to deliver goods or services that they have agreed to supply under a valid transaction or contract.

(RCCA, Part VI, Section 4).

This tort is a strict liability offense, carrying statutory penalties.

Defendant agreed to supply a finished custom portrait of the Plaintiff and failed to provide the service and finished product he agreed to supply. eviltom_ paid Defendant $11,000 in exchange for a custom portrait. Defendant did not deliver a custom portrait. Instead, Defendant accepted payment, and then did not respond to multiple attempts at outreach from the Plaintiff.

Plaintiffs allege that Defendant had no lawful excuse for failing to deliver the promised goods. Plaintiffs suffered damages because they paid money and did not receive anything in return.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from this Court:

1. $11000 in Compensatory Damages. Under Part VI, Section 1 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, the defendants actions constitute a Breach of Contract and the Plaintiff seeks restitution in the form of $11,000.

2. $11040 in Punitive Damages. Under Part VI, Section 4, Failure to Deliver Goods or Services the remedy provides for up to 200 civil-penalty-units(CPUs). The Plaintiff is seeking punitive damages of comparable value to compensatory damages at $11,040 or 92 CPUs.

3. 30% of the total awarded as legal fees as provided under part III, section 7 of the Redmont Civil Code Act.



VI. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: P-007

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 28th day of August 2026