- Joined
- Apr 7, 2020
- Messages
- 2,468
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
End
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The Executive has failed in its duties and judicial intervention is required to remedy an unjust employment termination.
I. PARTIES
(1) xEndeavour
(2) Commonwealth (Department of Construction and Transport)
II. FACTS
(1) The Plaintiff was employed as a Constructor in the Department of Construction and Transport for a period of five years.
(2) The Plaintiff was widely recognised as one of the most active and productive members of the Department during their employment.
(3) On 30 March 2025, the Plaintiff informed the Secretary of the Department of a temporary period of inactivity due to StateCraft commitments.
(4) The Secretary acknowledged and accepted this notification without raising any objections or issuing a warning.
(5) Despite this, the Plaintiff was terminated from the Department on the basis of inactivity during the acknowledged absence.
(6) The Plaintiff was not given any formal warning, disciplinary process, or opportunity to respond before the dismissal.
(7) There was no indication that the Department was undergoing financial hardship or operational downsizing that necessitated the Plaintiff’s termination.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
(1) The Plaintiff asserts that the termination constitutes unfair dismissal under s13 of the Commercial Standards Act.
(2) The dismissal was not made under s13.1(a), as no business necessity or operational reasoning was presented to justify the termination.
(3) The dismissal was not made under s13.1(b), as the Plaintiff’s continued employment posed no detriment to the Department’s workflow, reputation, or legal standing.
(4) The dismissal violates s13.1(d), as a reasonable person would not consider it fair to terminate a long-serving employee for temporary inactivity that had been communicated and acknowledged.
(5) The Defendant failed to afford procedural fairness and acted in a manner inconsistent with established employee protections.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
(1) A declaration that the Plaintiff’s dismissal was unfair under s13 of the Commercial Standards Act.
(2) An order compelling the Defendant to reinstate the Plaintiff to their former position within the Department.
(3) Reasonable compensation for reputational damage and loss of employment caused by the Defendant’s conduct.
(4) Punitive compensation for unlawful conduct.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 5th day of May 2025
