Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. Alexthelillion [2024] FCR 93

[Unseatedduke1]

OBJECTION
Nothing Pending

Witness was asked to provide a number

Sustained. The extra detail will be struck.

 

[Unseatedduke1]

OBJECTION
Incompetent

Q1 - Assuming that as a tenant this person does not have ownership over the shop, as evidenced by witness testimony, this witness is incompetent to answer this question as it is not their store

Sustained. Question struck.

 

[Unseatedduke1]

MOTION TO STRIKE

Witness was incompetent to answer question and therefore, assuming the previous objection is sustained, this answer should be struck from the record

Sustained.

 

[Unseatedduke1]

The Plaintiff has 72 hours to provide their closing.

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Your Honor, the plaintiff has failed to provide their closing statement. The defense requests that we therefore skip the plaintiff's closing statement as they have not met their deadline.

 

[Unseatedduke1]

Towloo is herby held in contempt.

The defense has 72 hours to provide their closing.

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Thank you, Your Honor.

———

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Closing Statement

Your Honor, whether or not it has been proven that my client has committed violent offenses against the plaintiff, the fact is that the plaintiff has been able to substantiate none of its prayers for relief with evidence. So far we have gotten zero evidence of any emotional damages or damages to the property in the form of it closing down, except for word from the plaintiff’s lawyer, which cannot determine a verdict (see Lawsuit: Adjourned - Mercuryellow v. Pandaz8 [2021] DCR 65). Additionally, any punishment strictly for committing crimes is under the jurisdiction of the DHS. Regarding the witness testimony that they were defending the shop for five hours total, they could have been guarding it from literally anything, including players (not listed as defendants) banned from the shop, for example.

The plaintiff has presented virtually no evidence for any of the damages it claims. The defense rests its case.

 

[Unseatedduke1]

Court is in recess pending verdict.

 

[Unseatedduke1]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT

Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. Alexthelillion [2024] FCR 93

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The defendant has constantly harassed the plaintiffs, causing them to close their business, live in constant fear of being shot, and preventing them from going about their daily lives. The plaintiffs claim that the defendant's actions, which include showing up at their shop and shooting towards them, have caused significant emotional, financial, and personal harm.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Despite the plaintiff’s assertions, they have failed to substantiate any of their claims with concrete evidence. There is no proof of emotional damages or property damage, such as the alleged closure of the shop, beyond unsupported statements from the plaintiff’s lawyer

III. THE COURT OPINION

1. This ruling is based on the information presented by the parties and matters commonly known to the public.
2. Three cases were filed with the same plaintiffs against three different individuals, all making similar claims. While this case bears similarities to FCR 91 and FCR 92, key differences have guided this decision.
3. The evidence shows that the defendant committed one murder of Plaintiff Dragonfly0001. While a single murder is not typically sufficient for damages, especially in a realm of DC where such incidents are common, this case is notable. The defendant unlawfully broke into a location where the Plaintiff was hiding, using a lockpick, as confirmed by video evidence. This intrusion into what is considered a safe space (i.e., work or home) and the subsequent murder warrant the awarding of emotional damages.
4. Other claims, such as store closures and attacks on other plaintiffs, lack sufficient supporting evidence. For these, I refer to the precedent set in my FCR 92 verdict.

IV. DECISION
In the matter of FCR 93, the court rules in favor of the plaintiff with the following modified relief:

1. $3,000 awarded to Dragonfly0001 for emotional damages.
2. $900 awarded to Towloo for legal fees.
3. No damages awarded to Brustklefurry or YourLocalDiabeto.

The Federal Court thanks all involved.