Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025]

[TheGreat_Boi]

Case Filing​

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Doc
Plaintiff

V.

qsdt
Defendant

COMPLAINT

On 4/25/2025, Qsdt offered me $5,000 to kill him. While I originally told him no, he then offered me $10,000 to kill him, so I did, but once I did, he said that he wouldn't pay me, and in his words, "I completely lied; I'm not good for it," as well as saying he didn't have the money to pay me anymore even though before he said that I had done /balance Qsdt, and it showed he had around $40,000 in his account. and afterwards reported me for killing him, giving me a wanted level. Because of this, I was scared to play because I didn't want to get arrested and lose money.

For the convenience of the Court, images of the chat history have been attached

I. PARTIES
1. Doc (Plaintiff)
2. qsdt (Defendant)

II. FACTS

1. The plaintiff, Doc was offered 5k Redmont Dollars in order to kill the defendant, qsdt. After Initially rejecting the offer, the defendant rose the amount offered to 10k Redmont Dollars. The plantiff then hunted qsdt down, killing him in order to get the proposed 10k.
2. Previously to qsdt getting killed by Doc, a thrid party player killed qsdt, then promptly asked for the money. qsdt told him that he meant for doc to kill him, and didn't give him the money.
3. After qsdt was killed by Doc, qsdt did not give him the money, going so far as to say "I completely lied I'm not good for it"

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The plaintiff would like to argue that the discourse that occurred between himself and qsdt constituted a contract, which qsdt broke by not paying him.
2. As per Redmont Law, contracts are legally binding provided they have all of the following: Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Intent, and Capacity.
3. There is clearly an offer stated here, as the defendant pushes for the plaintiff to accept his proposal.
4. Acceptance, while not explicitly stated by the plaintiff, is heavily implied by the hunting down, and killing of qsdt by the plaintiff. (As per the conditions of the contract)
5. Consideration can be easily proven, as both sides have something to gain. The plantiff gains monetary value, and the defendant has a wish fulfilled. (His death)
6. Neither the plantiff nor the defendant at any point during their conversation showed any sign of joking, or non-seriousness that would constitute a lack of intent. In fact since the defendant pushes for the plaintiff to accept, that further proves this point.
7. The plaintiff has the ability to kill qsdt, as does anyone in the server, and shortly after the killing, the plantiff used the /bal command on the defendant, where he discovered he had 40k Redmont Dollars.
8. The defendant clearly had no intention of paying, constituting misrepresentation.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $10,000 in Compensatory Damages for direct financial loss due to Defendant's breach of contract.
2. $5,000 in Consequential Damages for loss of enjoyment and emotional distress caused by fear of arrest.
3. $6,000 minimum in Legal Fees, subject to Section 9(2)(c) of the Legal Damages Act.

V. EVIDENCE


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of May 2025.