Lawsuit: Pending Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum) v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61

[dodrio3]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev (Represented by Lex Titanum)
Plaintiff

v.

YeetGlazer
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On August 3rd, 2025, in case [2025] FCR 76, the Defendant released a statement that senselessly accused the Plaintiff of corruption. In this statement, the Defendant claimed that “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under Criminal Code Act Part II, Section 1(a), by “us[ing] a government position to gain an unfair advantage for oneself or another, inconsistent with official duty.” Here, the DCT employee (Dearev) leveraged his official authority to evict the Plaintiff’s land earlier than permitted, which conferred an unfair advantage.”(P-001)

This statement constitutes Libel, defined as “A method of defamation expressed by documents, signs, published media, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person's reputation, exposes a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or injures a person in his/her business, profession or organization.” The accusation was based solely on a singular screenshot of Dearev asking to purchase the plot. In reality, Dearev’s only involvement was assigning the plots to the government, and he had no part in reporting the plot or initiating its auction.

Additionally, the Defendant committed Slander, defined as “A false statement, usually made through either discord or in-game messages, which defames another person’s reputation, business, profession, or organization.” In this case, the Defendant repeatedly referred to the Plaintiff as a “Thug” causing further reputational harm. (P-002)

The need to present evidence where the Plaintiff stated “I leave my approval to consider the GER a paramilitary extremist group instead of a party” demonstrates that this is a public political attack on the Plaintiff using false information. This conduct constitutes an intentional and malicious attempt to damage the Plaintiff’s reputation and standing. (P-003)

I. PARTIES
1. Dearev - Plaintiff
2. YeetGlazer - Defendant
3. Lawnsloper - DCT Employee/Witness

II. FACTS
1. On 3rd of August 2025 YeetGlazer Filed [2025] FCR 76
2. Within [2025] FCR 76 YeetGlazer’s Attorney Stated “The Plaintiff posits that premature eviction also amounts to Corruption as defined by Redmont’s criminal code. A government official commits corruption, under Criminal Code Act Part II, Section 1(a), by “us[ing] a government position to gain an unfair advantage for oneself or another, inconsistent with official duty.” Here, the DCT employee (Dearev) leveraged his official authority to evict the Plaintiff’s land earlier than permitted, which conferred an unfair advantage.”
3. From the 3rd of August to the 8th of August YeetGlazer Continuously referred to Dearev as a “Thug”

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. In the No More Defamation Act it states that “(1) Damages caused by defamation, if proven in a civil court of law, shall be paid out as determined by the presiding Judicial Officer.

(a) In addition, the courts may require the tortfeasor of defamation to issue an apology, which may be made public and/or to the parties with which the defamatory communication was made.”

And “(a) Defamation is a false statement and/or communication that injures a third party's reputation. The tort of defamation includes both libel and slander.”

2. The Defendant Suffered emotional damages due to the stress from the statements as he had just been appointed Acting Attorney General.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $10,000 In Punitive Damages for the Libel Statements Against Dearev
2. $10,000 In Punitive Damages for the Slanderous Statements Against Dearev
3. $15,000 In Emotional Damages for the Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont
4. $15,000 In Consequential Damages for the Humiliation of the Plaintiff
5. 30% of the case’s value in legal fees paid to Lex Titanum.
(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 12 day of August 2025

P-001

P-002

P-003

 

[dodrio3]

Proof of Representation