Lawsuit: Dismissed Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 102

[Dartanboy]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dartanman
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On November 30, 2023, Dartanman was denied a paste because the building was an eyesore.

This is illegal, as the build does not meet the objective, legal definition of "eyesore."

I. PARTIES
1. Dartanman
2. Commonwealth

II. FACTS
1. At some point prior to November 30, Dartanman was removed from a plot via eminent domain.
2. Part of the eminent domain deal included a free paste. This was confirmed by DCT Employee xEndeavour on November 29. [Exhibit A]
3. On November 30, Dartanman explained which building he wanted pasted and where he wanted it pasted. [Exhibit B]
4. DCT Secretary Nacholebraa first said they could paste it in but warned me it was an eyesore. [Exhibit B]
5. After contesting that this build was an eyesore, Nacholebraa informed me that the DCT would be denying the already-approved free paste. [Exhibit C]
6. DCT policy defines "Eyesore" specifically as a build which:

• Looks like a box or pyramid
• Has limited windows
• Has alot of clutter
• Is constructed from limited, basic materials such as dirt or cobblestone
• A commercial property in a residential zone or vice versa
• Is not structurally sound
• Uses too many potentially clashing colors and/or materials
• Has an unrealistic interior or one that does not belong in the city
• Or has ground outside entirely made of stone.

7. This build does not meet the above requirements to be an "eyesore."
8. Secretary Nacholebraa explained specifically that this build:

• Looks like a box
• Uses limited materials
• And has clashing colors of red and white [Exhibit C]

9. Oxford Dictionary defines "box" as "a receptacle of any size, typically with four square or rectangular sides and a lid, used for containing, storing, or transporting things." (Oxford English Dictionary)
10. The Clarity Act makes the Oxford Dictionary the official dictionary of Redmont.
11. Thus, to be shaped like a box, it must have four square or rectangular sides. As shown in Exhibit B, this build does not meet that description. In fact, I'd argue that most CBD plots are more "shaped like a box" than this build.
12. Red does not clash with white. It goes together quite nicely. One great IRL example of red and white going together is Iowa State's Away Game American Football Uniform.
13. "Limited materials" is not valid to be an eyesore, rather they must be "Limited, basic materials."
14. In [2023] FCR 27 (Lawsuit: Adjourned - The Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 27), the Federal Court explained "According to the DCT limited basic materials are blocks such as dirt, cobblestone and anything similar. A reasonable person would not put quartz in the same category as dirt and cobblestone."
15. Concrete and its colored variants certainly do not belong in the same category as cobblestone and dirt.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The DCT has improperly denied my paste, declaring it is an "eyesore."

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A Writ of Mandamus ordering the DCT to paste in my plot.
2. $200 per day this case goes on, as the other two main Luxor locations bring in well over $20,000/month.
3. $10,000 in Punitive Damages as the DCT Secretary (who also happens to be the Vice President) should be more familiar with DCT policy and should not arbitrarily deny pastes for buildings that clearly meet the standards to be builds in Reveille.
4. $50,000 for Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont, as I was operating under the belief I could enjoy Redmont by creating my Casino on c531, and I am now unable to do so because of this harm.
5. $12,000 in legal fees.

Total: Writ of Mandamus, $72,000, and $200 per day this case continues.

 EVIDENCE

Spoiler: Exhibit A

Spoiler: Exhibit B

Spoiler: Exhibit C

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 30th day of November 2023.

 

[Dartanboy]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI

First off, I want to be very clear:
This building is not an eyesore. It does not meet the requirements to be an eyesore. The DCT does not have the authority to arbitrarily decide that it is an eyesore.

That said, I've received hateful messages about the build (amongst several positive ones as well), and have been informed that if I were to win this case, some members of Congress would push for dictatorial laws that give the DCT judicial power.

I am asking this case be dismissed not because it makes sense to me, but because I wish to protect our beloved country from even further overreach of power.

Thank you.

 

[Neemfy]

Case dismissed at the request of the Plaintiff.