Lawsuit: Dismissed Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] DCR 46

[Dartanboy]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Dartanman
(Plaintiff)

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
(Defendant)

 COMPLAINT
First of all, this is a serious issue and I'm not comfortable hiring someone else to represent me in this case. I recognize that I am a Justice, but I am only representing myself - not someone else - so this should be permissible, as long as I recuse from similar cases that occur concurrently.

As for the complaint:
The DLA and RBI have conducted an unreasonable search and seizure against me - which the Constitution protects me from.

Furthermore, when I refused to allow the unreasonable search, I was charged with Obstruction of Justice - or at least, the RBI was instructed to charge me. I have not been in-game since this happened and it may or may not have occurred yet.

I. PARTIES
1. Dartanman
2. Commonwealth of Redmont

II. FACTS
1. On November 5, 2023, at 3:31AM Central Time, Attorney General AlexanderLove sent me a Writ of Detention (Exhibit A)
2. The Writ of Detention stated that I was required to "appear in the Department of Legal Affairs discord by the expiration date / time to report for an interview or interrogation." and that I was "being lawfully detained." (Exhibit D)
3. I was already present in the Discord, as I never left after resigning as Attorney General. I cannot prove this but AlexanderLove knows this is true and if the DLA does not affirm this fact, I will call witnesses and object on perjury.
4. Because I was already present, the Attorney General added me to a ticket under the category "Interrogation Room" (Exhibit B).
5. I was told I was not being accused of a crime and that, therefore, my right against self incrimination did not apply (Exhibit C).
6. There is no evidence that they had reasonable suspicion that I committed a crime.
7. After the Attorney General warned me that non-compliance would result in an Obstruction of Justice charge, I provided the definition of that crime and stated I'd rather not answer any questions (Exhibit C).
8. I was then told I would be charged (Exhibit C).
9. The Constitution states "Every citizen has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure."

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. By detaining me without reasonable suspicion, the DLA violated my right against Unreasonable Seizure.
2. By forcing me to answer questions, the DLA attempted to perform an Unreasonable Search of my own thoughts and memories.
3. My actions do not match the definition of Obstruction of Justice.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. The DLA stop detaining me.
2. The DLA recognize the right against Unreasonable Search and Seizure.
3. The DLA issue a public apology that explains why their actions here were illegal.
4. The DLA commit to never detaining anyone without reasonable suspicion, and never attempt to conduct an unreasonable search again.
5. $20,000 in Punitive Damages, as the Attorney General and Department of Legal Affairs are expected to uphold the law. The Constitution states that Executive Officers (including the Attorney General) are to "defend the constitution and the laws of the commonwealth."

EVIDENCE
Exhibit A:

Spoiler: Writ of Detention

Exhibit B:

Spoiler: Interrogation Room

Exhibit C:

Spoiler: Ticket Screenshot

Exhibit D: [DLA] Writ of Detention - Dartanman

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 5th day of November 2023.

 

[Dartanboy]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION 1

I ask that the court prohibit the Commonwealth from charging me with Obstruction of Justice for these events for the duration of this case, as I was informed I'd be charged every 18 hours I do not answer questions.

This case is precisely about the legality of this and it would be unfair to allow repetitive fines and jail time while this case is ongoing.

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION 2

I ask that the court order the DLA to cease my detention and interrogation for the duration of this case, as this case is about the legality of those actions and it would be unfair to allow them to continue.

 

[Dartanboy]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND

If I am charged with Obstruction of Justice, I would like to add that being removed from my record to my prayer for relief.

 

[Alexander P. Love]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION 1

I ask that the court prohibit the Commonwealth from charging me with Obstruction of Justice for these events for the duration of this case, as I was informed I'd be charged every 18 hours I do not answer questions.

This case is precisely about the legality of this and it would be unfair to allow repetitive fines and jail time while this case is ongoing.

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION 2

I ask that the court order the DLA to cease my detention and interrogation for the duration of this case, as this case is about the legality of those actions and it would be unfair to allow them to continue.

Response, your honor?

 

[RelaxedGV]

Due to the nature of the Plaintiff's position arguing Constitutionality and because original jurisdiction on questions of constitutionality lies in the Federal Court per the Judicial Update Act, this case is to be refiled there.

With that, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.