- Joined
- May 27, 2026
- Messages
- 34
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Cyanfounder (represented independently by NoMoreUno)
Plaintiff
v.
.KingCorbin100
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On June 14, 2026, the defendant, .KingCorbin100, posted this thread. The defendant was in search of a crew to renovate his house. He specified himself to have a "low budget of $10K". Six hours later, the defendant followed up, saying that a worker had already been hired. This worker, Cyanfounder, the plaintiff, was, as the job offer entailed, told to renovate the defendant's house (rh012). The method of payment was determined beforehand- the defendant agreed to work with only $9k, in exchange for $4.5k upfront. The defendant agreed to these terms.
The plaintiff was given the permissions required to edit the defendant's house, and, after a quick trip to collect the materials required to begin renovations, began just that. The plaintiff proceeded with renovations- at some point before the renovations were finished, the defendant even specifically acknowledged that the renovations were 'going great' and told the defendant to 'keep up the good work, implying there was no issue with the quality of the renovations that may have led to an undisclosed reason for withholding payment.
When the plaintiff finished renovations, he was asked to send pictures proving completion to the defendant. The plaintiff obliged to take the walk back to the property which he had just left, and took the requested pictures to finalize the transaction. However, the defendant did not respond to the pictures once they had been sent. In fact, the defendant has not replied to the plaintiff in any manner since these pictures were sent.
As of 6/17/26, more than two days after the plaintiff informed the defendant that renovations had been finished and sent pictures as requested, the remaining $4.5k has not been paid out to the plaintiff, nor has the completion of these renovations even been addressed, despite the fact that in all previous interactions the defendant had responded punctually (at most within a period of 5 hours). Nothing indicates that the defendant took issue with any of the plaintiff's work that would have stopped this payment.
I. PARTIES
1. CyanFounder (Plaintiff)
2. .KingCorbin100 (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. The plaintiff was hired by the defendant on 6/14/26 to renovate the defendant's house, rh012. Prior to work beginning, payment was agreed upon- $4.5k upfront, and an additional $4.5k after renovations had been completed. The plaintiff was paid $4.5k upfront as agreed.
2. The plaintiff renovated the defendant's house and recieved multiple affirmations confirming the work was up to standard.
3. Once finished, the plaintiff obliged to the defendant's request to send over photos of the final renovations.
4. Despite having responded promptly (promptly here defined as within 5 hours at the most) to all of the plaintiff's messages, the defendant has not, as of 6/17/26, responded to the plaintiff's attempt to acquire the money entitled to him.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. A contract requires five things to be proven in order to be valid- offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, and capacity.
The validity of the contract is proven as follows:
OFFER- The defendant proposed the offer of $10k in exchange for renovations. The plaintiff proposed $9k with half upfront, terms to which the defendant explicity agreed, implying his willingness to enter into a contract. The plaintiff can be reasonably inferred to have been seeking to enter into a contract, since he was the once who proposed $9k.
ACCEPTANCE- Both parties expressed clear agreement.
CONSIDERATION- One party was to recieve $10k, while the other party was to recieve renovations. This proves the exchange of something of value between parties.
INTENT- The plaintiff very explicitly expressed his desire to form a contract, to which the defendant agreed. This proves intent to form a contract.
CAPACITY- Both players had over six hours of playtime. This proves capacity.
2. Breach of Contract is defined as a tort in which the defendant:
(a) fails to perform obligations under a valid and enforceable contract without lawful excuse.
This violation shall not occur where:
(b) the contract is void or voidable; or
(c) performance was rendered impossible by circumstances beyond the party’s control; or
(d) the other party materially breached the contract first; or
(e) the party was induced to enter the contract through misrepresentation or duress.
The defendant has not given a lawful excuse and has not performed his obligations. Nothing in the contract makes it voidable; perfomance was not beyond the defendant's control, as he had over $4.5k to his name; the plaintiff did not fail to renovate the defendant's house and, thus, did not breach contract; and neither party was duressed or misrepresented into entering a contract.
3. Outrageous conduct is defined as "conduct that demonstrates a substantial departure from acceptable standards of behaviour and reflects a wilful, dishonest, oppressive, reckless, or grossly negligent disregard for the rights, interests, or safety of others." The defendant has a balance of more than $4.5k and initially proposed a budget of $10k. The defendant currently has less than $50 to their name- withholding the $4.5k that was reasonably expected is gross and negligent, intentional or not, especially as the plaintiff purchased his own materials to renovate the defendant's house. In addition to this, ny essentially ghosting the plaintiff without paying the agreed upon amount, the defendant is showing he has an either dishonest or grossly negligent disregard for the plaintiff's time and work and that he has no interest in paying him.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $4,500 ($4.5k) in compensatory damages, as allowed for by Breach of Contract
2. $5,000 in punitive damages, allowed by the outrageous conduct of the defendant
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
Evidence is as follows:
P-001: The defendant's initial offer and budget
DATED: This 17th day of June, 2026
