EATB
Not-so-benevolent dictator
State Department
Supporter
Aventura Resident
Public Affairs Department
Interior Department
Commerce Department
Construction & Transport Department
Health Department
EATB
Electoral Manager
- Joined
- May 11, 2025
- Messages
- 595
- Thread Author
- #1
CONGRESS OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
A BILL TO
AMEND THE CRIMINAL CODE TO REINTRODUCE CORRUPTION AS AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE
The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law:
PART I — PRELIMINARIES
1. Short Title and Enactment
(1) This Act may be cited as the 'Corruption Reintroduction Act’
(2) This Act shall be enacted immediately upon its signage.
(3) This Act has been authored by Representative EATB and Speaker of the House xXTheoryXx.
(4) This Act has been co-sponsored by Speaker of the House xXTheoryXx.
(5) This Act amends the following acts:
(a) Criminal Code Act
2. Reasons and Intent
(1) The previous replacement of the "Corruption" charge with "Abuse of Power" inadvertently creates legal loopholes allowing officials to exploit discretionary powers for personal gain, provided they strictly follow procedural law or obtain a protective legal opinion.
(2) Reintroducing the "Corruption" offence closes the "Lawful Discretion" loophole by properly focusing on the unethical intent and result of an action, such as gaining an unfair advantage, rather than solely focusing on procedural legality.
(3) To effectively criminalise cronyism and self-enrichment, ensuring that all government employees and officials are held to the highest ethical standards of the Commonwealth.
(4) To replace the current "Abuse of Power" offence entirely with a robust "Corruption" offence, eliminating prosecutorial ambiguity.
PART II — AMENDMENTS TO THE CRIMINAL CODE ACT
3. Reintroduction of the Corruption Offence
(1) Section 1 of PART II: PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF GOVERNMENT of the Criminal Code Act shall be amended as follows:
"
Offence Type: Indictable
Penalty: Up to 500 Penalty Units; Up to 2 months disqualification from public office
A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) exercises any power, function, or duty vested in them by virtue of their position as members of the Executive, Legislative, or Judicial branches, or employee of a government agency, in contravention of the law; and
(b) either:
(i) knows that the exercise of power is unlawful; or
(ii) acts with reckless disregard as to whether the exercise of power is lawful.
It is a defence to a charge under this section if the person:
(c) made a good faith mistake as to the lawfulness of their conduct; or
(d) sought legal advice in good faith from a competent legal practitioner prior to exercising the power and reasonably relied on that advice.
Relevant Law:
1 - Corruption
Offence Type: Indictable
Penalty: Up to 500 Penalty Units; Up to 2 months disqualification from public office
A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) knowingly uses a government position, influence, or government resources to gain an advantage, benefit, or privilege for oneself or another, knowing that such benefit is not legitimately available by virtue of their role; or
(b) knowingly engages in self-enrichment, cronyism, or self-dealing by conferring benefits, appointments, contracts, or assets to themselves, friends, or associates, whilst utilising government resources and office, where no legitimate, objective, and fair basis exists for doing so; or
(c) exercises their lawful discretionary authority with the primary intent of securing a personal, financial, or other benefit for themselves or a specific third party, rather than serving the public interest, knowing that such exercise is not in the public interest.
This offence does not occur where:
(d) The advantage gained is a standard, publicly available benefit incidental to their role, such as a standard government salary, UBI, or routine compensation or commission not in contravention of existing statute.
It is a defence to a charge under this section if the person:
(e) sought legal advice in good faith from a competent legal practitioner prior to acting and reasonably relied on that advice, provided that such advice was not obtained with the intent of circumventing this offence.
Relevant Law:"