Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont Vs CHUD.Inc [2026] FCR 19

[aubunny]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

CHUD.Inc
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

On December 11th, the Commonwealth became aware of the possession of Mininukes and Fatmans', classified by the Criminal Terminology Act as a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) [Section 5.1.a.ii and Section 5.1.a.i of the CTA Respectively.] within the chestshops of a "CHUD.Inc", a sole proprietorship beholden to the user "CzarKovalev". These chestshops were located on the plots C530, and CBD041. Through the search of publicly accessible areas within these plots, conducted on January 10th, 2026, the RBI was able to determine the intent to sell both products in publicly accessible and ongoing chestshops, constituting Conspiracy to Commit Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking, as the chestshops within the property owned by the defendant would hold 3,485 WMDs in total. Additionally, warrants conducted by the RBI reveal the Trafficking of 257 WMDs between defendant and citizen Taskings_, who utilizing their access to the chestshops, conducted transactions between the two beholden parties. [P-02] [P-03] An Additional 8 WMDs were sold to the public, with 3 different individual sales, [P-01][P-04][P-05] constituting the Trafficking of Weapon of Mass Destruction as defined in the Redmont Criminal Code Part VI, §8.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. CzarKovalev
3. Chud.Inc

II. FACTS
1. On or before the Date of January 10th 2026, CHUD.Inc was holding chestshops within the plots C530 and CBD041
2. These chestshops, at the date of seizure of its contents, contained a combined 3,485 items
3. These referenced items fall under the category of WMD, per the Criminal Terminology Act.
4. The Criminal Code Act Part VI, §8 defines Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking as "sells, distributes, or traffics any substance deemed to be a weapon of mass destruction".
5. In one instance, 192 WMDs were traded between the defendant, and citizen Taskings_
6. In an additional separate instance, 25 WMDs were traded between the defendant, and citizen Taskings_
7. On or around January 7th, 2026, CHUD.Inc sold 2 WMDs to buyer JustaDumpling, with the sale taking place within either C530 or CBD041.
8. On or around January 8th, 2026 CHUD.Inc sold 1 WMD to buyer roy405, with the sale taking place within either C530 or CBD041.
9. On or around the 10th of December, 2025, 5 WMDs were sold to buyer NukeyPooky, with the sale taking place within either C530 or CBD041.
10. Facts 5 through 9 constitute either distribution, transfer, or sale between parties.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. 1. Five Counts of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking. Given that the sale of both Fatmans and MiniNukes is illegal under the Criminal Code Act Part VI, § 8. One charge for each individual instance of distribution.


IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
300 Penalty Units [30 Thousand Redmont Dollars] for 5 counts of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking,Given a reduced sentencing from 100 Penalty Units per crime.
75 Minutes of Imprisonment, for 5 counts of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking, Given a reduced sentencing from the 60 minutes Imprisonment per charge for the crime.

V. WITNESS LIST
1) Superwoops -RBI Investigator in charge of investigation into CHUD.INC


VI. EVIDENCE:

Spoiler: P-01

Spoiler: P-02

Spoiler: P-03

Spoiler: P-04

Spoiler: P-05

Spoiler: P-06

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 16th day of March 2026

 

[Franciscus]

Writ of Summons

@CzarKovalev, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont Vs CHUD.Inc [2026] FCR 19

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[aubunny]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

The Plaintiff brings to attention the fact that the defendant CHUD.Inc's sole proprietor, CzarKovalev, is permanently deported.
Deported players have no rights in our nation (SCR 2 [2025])
Pursuant to The Legal Entity Act (Section 10), a sole proprietorship cannot be represented independently of its owner.

There is no defense allotted to the opposing party, and as such, the case should go to default judgement, similar to precedent set in (FCR 122 [2025]) or (FCR 57 [2025])

 

[Franciscus]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

The Plaintiff brings to attention the fact that the defendant CHUD.Inc's sole proprietor, CzarKovalev, is permanently deported.
Deported players have no rights in our nation (SCR 2 [2025])
Pursuant to The Legal Entity Act (Section 10), a sole proprietorship cannot be represented independently of its owner.

There is no defense allotted to the opposing party, and as such, the case should go to default judgement, similar to precedent set in (FCR 122 [2025]) or (FCR 57 [2025])

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER - MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Granted.

The Court is in recess pending a verdict. Should this Court have a question of the prosecution, this Court shall issue a corresponding Order to Show Cause pursuant to Section 10 of the Regulations of the Federal Court.