Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. National Exchange of Redmont [2026] FCR 17

Superwoops

Citizen
Public Defender
Oakridge Resident
Justice Department
5th Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls
Superwoops
Superwoops
Public Defender
Joined
Jan 3, 2025
Messages
237

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

National Exchange of Redmont
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The National Exchange of Redmont, tasked with keeping order and lawfulness in the exchange of securities, has violated the trust of investors by allowing a fraudulent business, Royal Dragon & Shell, to be listed on their platform for 5 months. This has not only hurt the stability of the financial sector, but the Commonwealth as a whole, and must not go unpunished.


I. PARTIES
Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
National Exchange of Redmont (Defendant)
.MgChamp2339 (CEO of the National Exchange of Redmont)


II. FACTS
1. RoyalDragon&Shell and RDS are two sole proprietorships owned by Luke201556 with a combined balance of $0. (P-001, P-002)
2. Royal Dragon and Shell was a publicly-traded security from August 11th, 2025, to January 11th, 2026, on the National Exchange of Redmont with 2,000,000 shares issued. (P-003, P-004, P-005)
3. Royal Dragon and Shell is not, and was never, an incorporated entity.
4. Sole proprietorships are owned by one person.
5. The then-active Act of Congress - Legal Entity Act did not allow for sole proprietorships to issue shares.
6. On August 11th, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO listed RDS on its platform, and reinforced the proposed initial valuation of $12,326,861.24. (P-003)
7. On September 21st, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO listed RDS’s monthly reporting, reinforcing the proposed valuation of $14,105,470.84. (P-003)
8. On October 21st, 2025, a member of the National Exchange of Redmont management team listed RDS’s monthly reporting, reinforcing the proposed valuation of $14,535,178.48. (P-003)
9. On November 7th, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO listed RDS’s monthly reporting, reinforcing the proposed valuation of $17,576,779.2. (P-003)
10. On November 11th, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO announced an RDS shareholders meeting and acknowledged the apparent existence of an RDS Board of Directors. (P-003)
11. During the month of October 2025, RDS reported total assets of $17,576,779.20 DC. (P-003, P-006)
12. All of the aforementioned valuations rely on a 1:10 exchange rate between $CRP and $DC as audited by Vendeka and reported by RDS. (P-003, P-006, P-007)
13. The real exchange rate between $CRP and $DC is lower than 1:10.
14. The Azalea Isles (CityRP) are not recognised by Redmont.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. 4 counts of Third-Party Misrepresentation: The National Exchange of Redmont signed off on the firm’s listing of foreign assets as assets in Redmont using a 1:10 exchange rate from the date of the initial listing on August 11th, up until the liquidation of RDS on January 11th. This greatly inflated the true value of Royal Dragon & Shell in Redmont from not even close to $1,000,000, all the way up to over $17,000,000. Its listing was also permitted despite its status of non-incorporation. The Commercial Standards Act grants Stock Exchanges the privilege of being the sole type of institution able to list securities, and this privilege comes with a responsibility. By not reporting a problem with RDS’s operations, the National Exchange of Redmont breached its duty of care mandated by the Act of Congress - Legal Entity Act and that any other reasonable Manager would have had considering that the investments of several citizens were at stake. In this way, NER aided RDS in committing Market Manipulation. Each count of Third-Party Misrepresentation represents each time the NER posted RDS’s monthly financial reports on its platform - each of these were distinct and repeated acts of misrepresentation.
2. 1 count of Misleading Advertising: By claiming that RDS was able to have shareholders on November 11th, the National Exchange of Redmont committed Misleading Advertising as, while shares may be given out on NER, the issuing of these shares are not authorised in Redmont under the Legal Entity Act, which requires a Certificate of Incorporation to authorise shares.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. 400 Penalty Units and 40 minutes of imprisonment for 4 counts of Third-Party Misrepresentation.
2. 50 Penalty Units for 1 count of Misleading Advertising.

V. WITNESSES
1. ElysiaCrynn (DOC Secretary)
2. DonTrillions (FRB Governor)


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 3rd day of March 2026.

EVIDENCE:

SEE PDF.
SEE PDF.
SEE PDF.
 

Attachments

  • P-002.png
    P-002.png
    76.2 KB · Views: 6
  • P-004.png
    P-004.png
    73 KB · Views: 4
  • P-005.png
    P-005.png
    30.5 KB · Views: 3
  • P-006.pdf
    P-006.pdf
    204.2 KB · Views: 2
  • P-007.pdf
    P-007.pdf
    93.3 KB · Views: 2
  • P-008.png
    P-008.png
    106.3 KB · Views: 3
  • P-009.pdf
    P-009.pdf
    107.1 KB · Views: 3
  • P-001.png
    P-001.png
    13.9 KB · Views: 4
Given my ownership of TheStockExchange, I publicly recuse from the consideration or discussion of this case.
 

Writ of Summons


@MgChamp, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. National Exchange of Redmont [2026] FCR 17

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Writ of Summons​


@MgChamp, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. National Exchange of Redmont [2026] FCR 17
Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.
Present your honor
 
Back
Top