Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. MC20masarati [2025] FCR 57

[ToadKing]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

MC20masarati (aka "undatheradar")
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The Department of Justice has received evidence that the Defendant has engaged in the practice of law, without possessing the correct legal credentials as required by the Modern Legal Reform Act.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. MC20masarati (aka "undatheradar")

II. FACTS
1. The Defendant first engaged in the practice of law without any valid legal qualifications in the case fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54 (P-002), where as the defendant in that case, they represented themselves and filed two separate motions without possessing any legal credentials. (P-001)
2. On the 4th June 2025, at 01:28 (UTC+1), the Defendant obtained the rank of Solicitor.
3. Subsequently, on 4th June 2025, the Defendant filed their own case (P-003) in the Federal Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont, without the necessary legal rank of Barrister.
4. The Federal Court dismissed the Defendant's case sua sponte, with the presiding judge ruling that the Defendant "does not have the legal credentials defined in the Modern Legal Reform Act to file not only this case but any case in any court."
5. Under the Modern Legal Reform Act, only Barristers with appropriate specializations or Attorneys may file cases in Federal Court, unless under proper supervision as defined in Section 7.
6. The Defendant was representing themselves in both instances and was not under the supervision of a qualified Attorney.
7. The Defendant's actions constitute both practicing law without valid qualification and filing cases in courts beyond their qualification rank.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. Legal Fraud - In violation of Section 8(1) of the Modern Legal Reform Act, the Defendant engaged in the practice of law without any valid legal qualification by representing themselves and filing motions in the case fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54 without possessing any legal credentials.
2. Legal Malpractice - In violation of Section 8(2) of the Modern Legal Reform Act, the Defendant practiced law and filed cases in Federal Court beyond their qualification rank, as they possessed only the rank of Solicitor at the time of filing.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. A fine of $7,500 for Legal Fraud, as this constitutes a first offense under Section 8(1)(c)(i) of the Modern Legal Reform Act.
2. A fine of $7,500 for Legal Malpractice, as this constitutes a first offense under Section 8(2)(c)(i) of the Modern Legal Reform Act.

EVIDENCE:
- Defendant's lack of qualifications

Spoiler: P-001

- FluffyWaafelz v. undatheradar case showing Defendant's first instance of unauthorized practice of law

Spoiler: P-002

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54'

Jun 2, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


fluffywaafelz (represented by Mezimoří Law)
Plaintiff

v.

2.- ~undatheradar~ MC20masarati (a.k.a. "undatheradar")
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

The Plaintiff brings this action to recover funds unlawfully retained and misappropriated by the Defendant, undatheradar, in connection with a high-stakes poker game involving a $1,000,000 buy-in from each party...

• Patototongo1
• Replies: 35
• Forum: Case Archive

• 
• 

- Link to Defendant's case in FCR

Spoiler: P-003

Lawsuit: Dismissed Thread 'MC20masarati v. TheExchange [2025] FCR 55'

Wednesday at 2:19 AM

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

MC20masarati
Plaintiff

v.

The Exchange
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On June 3rd, 2025, the emergency asset freeze previously in effect was partially lifted, specifically unfreezing my holdings within The Exchange. At this time, only my bank balances and stock positions remain restricted, not liquid funds stored in a securities institution. Nonetheless, The Exchange blatantly ignored this and refuses to unfreeze my money.

I. PARTIES
1. MC20masarati...

• undatheradar
• Replies: 2
• Forum: Case Archive

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 5th day of June 2025

 

[ko531]

Writ of Summons

@undatheradar is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Mc20masarati [2025] FCR 58

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.