Novakerbal
Citizen
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2025
- Messages
- 105
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
Luke201556
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
On January 5th, 2026, the DOJ was made aware of potential fraudulent activity conducted by the Defendants company, Royal Dragon & Shell (RDS), by an investigative report published by the DOC secretary, ElysiaCrynn. Purported internal structuring documents provided by the company claimed legal status as an LLC. Additionally, the RDS balance statements and investor presentations listed a valuation of approximately $14,000,000, consisting primarily of both cash assets and property. Contrary to public statements provided by RDS, and its listing on the NER, RDS was never registered as an LLC under Redmontian jurisdiction, and legally existed as a sole-propretiorship owned entirely by Luke201556. Furthermore, all asset and cash valuations provided by RDS were based on assets held on a third party server "CityRP" under an arbitrarily determined exchange rate of 10:1(DC-CityRP). The aforementioned conduct constitutes False Advertisement, Fraud, and Market Manipulation as defined by the Criminal Code Act.
I. PARTIES
1. Luke201556 (Defendant)
2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
II. FACTS
1. Royal Dragon & Shell published a document purporting to constitute an LLC ownership structure, in addition to claiming the ability to create and issue shares (P-001).
2. The aforementioned ownership structure document was never approved by the Department of Commerce or incorporated pursuant to the Legal Entity Act.
3. The RDS October-November Balance sheet calculates valuation in CRP/DC$ by converting via a factor of 1:10 (P-002).
4. The August Investor Presentation lists all DC$ valuations as a simple 10x conversion of CRP$ valuations(P-003).
5. No substantial market for currency exchange between Redmont and CityRP exists - the purported exchange rate of 10:1 has no sound factual basis (this will be corroborated by Expert Witness Testimony).
6. The Royal Dragon & Shell firm created in Redmont as a sole-proprietorship retained a balance of $0, and a lack of any transaction or sales history(P-004).
7. All properties listed as being owned by RDS are located on CityRP (P-005).
8. Redmont does not recognize CityRP as a distinct entity or state, and does not recognize it as having any valid jurisdiction.
9. RDS was falsely listed as a publicly traded company, with a share price of $11.84 and 21 Shareholders(P-006).
10. Luke201556 owned a large majority of shares in RDS, which were actively traded(P-007).
III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. 1 Count of False Advertising, given that the dissemination of an Investor Presentation containing provably false claims about ownership structure and "shareholders" is illegal pursuant to the Criminal Code Act Part VII, §11(a).
2. 1 Count of Fraud, given that the misrepresentation of the ownership structure of RDS influenced investor behavior into purchasing falsely issued shares with no legal backing. Which is illegal pursuant to The Criminal Code Act Part VII, §7(a).
3. 1 Count of Fraud, given that the use of a falsified exchange rate to fraudulently inflate the valuation of a company's assets in order to influence investor decisions is illegal pursuant to The Criminal Code Act Part VII, §7(a).
4. 1 Counts of Market Manipulation, given that all properties listed as assets by the RDS Investor Presentation were fraudulently inflated in value, thusly fraudulently inflating the valuation of RDS securities, which is illegal pursuant to The Criminal Code Act Part VII, §2(b).
IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. A 100 Penalty Unit Fine, and 10 minutes of imprisonment, with respect to 1 Counts of Market Manipulation.
2. A 200 Penalty Unit Fine, 20 minutes of imprisonment, with respect to 2 Counts of Fraud.
3. A 50 Penalty Unit Fine, with respect to 1 Count of False Advertising.
Evidence List:
Witness List:
1. ElysiaCrynn (Expert Witness, DOC Secretary)
2. DonTrillions (Expert Witness, FRB Governor)
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 3rd day of March, 2025