Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. End [2025] FCR 97

[pricelessAgrari]

​

Case Filing

Case Filing​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

End
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
(Notice: The times used will be in CST, as that is my local time)
On the morning of August 4th, 2025, an investigative hearing was launched into End regarding a policy they created. At 4:00 a.m. the next day, End released classified conversations with the president at a CABINET level, claiming “Lucky i can release my own info” and “So what do you want to see” beforehand, and being told “due to possible classified information, the returned information will be restricted.” earlier by Omegabiebel. End ignored the Representative's efforts and released classified conversations. Seeing as End wrote the Classification Act and is a Secretary of the Cabinet, they should know what information is allowed to be released and what isn’t.


I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. End (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. An Investigative Hearing was held on August 4th, 2025, to investigate End’s improper handling of a new policy, titled “The Fairness Fee”.
2. End was told not to release the information before the screenshots were posted. (See p-005)
3. According to the Criminal Code Act, Breach of Integrity occurs when someone “shares classified information without authorisation.”.
4. By releasing the conversation, End knowingly released information that could have caused collateral damage to the Cabinet.
5. In the Classification Act, a Cabinet-level classification is considered “Information that has the potential to cause collateral damage to the solidarity of Cabinet.”.
6. Using this definition, it is clear that the secretary’s actions were unlawful.
7. During the investigation of End’s crime in the DoJ, they admitted that they knew this was a Breach of Integrity and understood what they had done was illegal.


III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. One count of Breach of Integrity- End’s actions in this incident showcased Breach of Integrity, using the definition laid out by the Criminal Code Act, “shares classified information without authorisation.”. End shared a CABINET-level classified conversation in a public chat, which is the exact definition given to us by the act.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. On one count of Breach of Integrity, a sentencing of 180 penalty points, as per the Criminal Code Act.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 21st day of September 2025

---

List of Evidence​

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Witness List
Omegabiebel
​

​

 

[pricelessAgrari]

I amended my lawsuit to add a prefix. Sorry for confusion.