Lawsuit: Dismissed Canadian Union v. BlogWorldExpo [2021] FCR 77

Status
Not open for further replies.

oviy4n

Citizen
Supporter
oviy4n
oviy4n
attorney
Joined
Feb 21, 2021
Messages
124
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Canadian Union (tekkovvs Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

BlogWorldExpo
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I. PARTIES
1. tekkovvs
2. Muffins29
3. BlogWorldExpo
4. Yerevan_ (Westray)
5. Westray (Witness)

II. FACTS
1. The defendant made multiple statements in a voice chat containing Muffphobia (ex. "Muffins sucks")
2. The defendant tried to bribe Supreme Court Justice Westray, to try to prevent him from testifying
3. The defendant falsely made allegations that my client Muffins29 was Gagaphobic, which is completely untrue
4. The defendant stated that he was recording the voice call
5. The defendant stated that "We employ hundreds of Redmont citizens to work in our crack factories. All 100% legal"
6. Multiple witnesses can attest to these things listed

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant shows no remorse for their actions
2. Muffins are a protected group under the Canadian Union

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The plaintiff seeks the following from the defendant:
1. A formal apology from the defendant, BlogWorldExpo
2. $5001 dollars

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)
1626469651234.png

1626469740985.png


Witnesses:
  • yerevan_
  • Westray
  • Muffins29

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: The 16th day of July, 2021
 
Your honour, the plaintiff also requests an in-game trial if possible.
 

Verdict

This lawsuit is hereby dismissed without prejudice on grounds of frivolity, for the following reasons:

1: The lawsuit has no legal basis, as "Muffphobia" is not in law, neither is "Gagaphobia"
2: Recording voice chats is a rule, not a law, as such all allegations of it should be brought to the attention of the staff team
3: Point 5 of "claims for relief" is completely irrelevant
4: There is no evidence of any of the claims bar two screenshots of the defendant joking about killing muffins, (the food, not the person,) with fire, which isn't even relevant to the conversation in voice chat which the lawsuit is based around

As such I hereby order the Department of Justice to fine the plaintiff $60 for Frivolous Court Case

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top