- Joined
- Jun 29, 2026
- Messages
- 7
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONTCIVIL ACTION
400kayear (Represented independently by Hill Hokan)
Plaintiff
v.
LarpTiktok
Defendant
COMPLAINTThe Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On July 4, 2026 at approximately 8:55 PM EST, the Defendant, LarpTiktok, agreed to sell the Plaintiff, 400kayear, an elytra for $2,600. The Defendant confirmed this exact price in chat. The Plaintiff paid the Defendant the agreed $2,600. Immediately after receiving payment, the Defendant activated ignore mode against the Plaintiff and never delivered the elytra. When the Plaintiff later attempted to contact the Defendant to resolve the matter, the Plaintiff found himself blocked.
I. PARTIES
II. FACTS
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
Claim I: Conversion
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
List of Evidence
P-001: Chat log showing the Defendant confirming the transaction price of $2,600 ("it's not 2.5k it's 2.6k"). Chat log showing the Plaintiff's payment of $2,600 to the Defendant.
P-002: Screenshot showing the Defendant has activated ignore mode against the Plaintiff ("LarpTiktok is ignoring you")
P-003: Screenshot confirming the Defendant's account (LarpTiktok) on the server's Discord
P-004: Screenshot showing the Plaintiff was blocked by the Defendant on Discord when attempting further contact, alongside the Plaintiff's messages confronting the Defendant.
Proof of Representation: Screenshot of the signed Independent Legal Services Agreement, confirming the Plaintiff's consent to be represented by Hill Hokan.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 5th day of July, 2026
400kayear (Represented independently by Hill Hokan)
Plaintiff
v.
LarpTiktok
Defendant
COMPLAINTThe Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On July 4, 2026 at approximately 8:55 PM EST, the Defendant, LarpTiktok, agreed to sell the Plaintiff, 400kayear, an elytra for $2,600. The Defendant confirmed this exact price in chat. The Plaintiff paid the Defendant the agreed $2,600. Immediately after receiving payment, the Defendant activated ignore mode against the Plaintiff and never delivered the elytra. When the Plaintiff later attempted to contact the Defendant to resolve the matter, the Plaintiff found himself blocked.
I. PARTIES
- 400kayear, Plaintiff
- LarpTiktok (also known as MyHeartMan), Defendant
- Hill Hokan, legal representative for Plaintiff (Proof below)
II. FACTS
- On July 4, 2026, the Defendant agreed to sell the Plaintiff an elytra for $2,600.
- The Defendant confirmed this exact price in chat, stating "it's not 2.5k it's 2.6k."
- The Plaintiff paid the Defendant $2,600, as recorded publicly in chat ("Paid LarpTiktok $2,600.00").
- Immediately after receiving payment, the Defendant activated ignore mode against the Plaintiff and ceased all communication.
- The Defendant never delivered the elytra.
- The Plaintiff subsequently attempted to contact the Defendant to resolve the matter and was blocked.
- The transaction took place at the airport, which is not the End, the Nether wild, or everwild.
- As of the filing of this complaint, the Defendant has neither delivered the elytra nor returned the $2,600.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
Claim I: Conversion
- Under the Civil Code Act, Part VII, Article 7, a person commits Conversion when they wrongfully take, obtain, or withhold property from an owner, intending to deprive the owner of it, by means including obtaining property through deception, lies, or false statements, or obtaining property by false promise pursuant to a scheme to defraud.
- The Defendant's conduct satisfies this definition. The Defendant confirmed a specific price for a specific item, accepted payment of that exact amount, and then immediately severed all contact and withheld both the item and the money.
- This sequence of events — confirmed price, payment, immediate silence, subsequent blocking — is not reasonably explained by anything other than the Defendant obtaining the payment through a false promise.
- The transaction occurred at the airport, so the exclusion under Article 7(d) for actions occurring in the End, Nether wild, or everwild does not apply.
- The Defendant cannot rely on the exclusion under Article 7(e) (reasonable belief of entitlement to the property), as the Defendant himself confirmed the transaction price immediately before disappearing with the funds.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
- $7,800 in Treble Damages (three times the $2,600 obtained through Conversion), pursuant to the Civil Code Act, Part VII, Article 7, and Part IV, Article 8.
- Legal fees, awarded at the greater of $3,000 (the District Court minimum) or 30% of the case value, pursuant to the Judicial Standards Act's provisions on Legal Fees.
- Any other relief the Court finds just and proper.
List of Evidence
P-001: Chat log showing the Defendant confirming the transaction price of $2,600 ("it's not 2.5k it's 2.6k"). Chat log showing the Plaintiff's payment of $2,600 to the Defendant.
P-002: Screenshot showing the Defendant has activated ignore mode against the Plaintiff ("LarpTiktok is ignoring you")
P-003: Screenshot confirming the Defendant's account (LarpTiktok) on the server's Discord
Proof of Representation: Screenshot of the signed Independent Legal Services Agreement, confirming the Plaintiff's consent to be represented by Hill Hokan.
89245[/ATTACH]
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 5th day of July, 2026