[2025] FCR 34 - Appeal

[ameslap]

Username: ameslap (Justice Compass Law)

I am representing a client

Who is your Client?: YeetGlazer

File(s) attached

What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 34

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Dismissed - YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 34

Basis for Appeal: This case was wrongfully dismissed. The precedent set out in Lawsuit: Adjourned - smokeyybunnyyy v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 103 gives a great example of this case.

1. Both cases are about fraudulent auction practices.
2. Both cases argue the DOC did not act properly.

Punitive Damages are the correct form of damages. The verdict in Smokeyybunyyy suggests that they would have issued punitive damages if not for the government trying to settle outside the court room. The DOC has not done so in this instance.

Furthermore, the Court in our case found that “the only alleged breach concerns internal department policy, and even then, the Department’s own rules expressly permit it to terminate auctions at any time.”

Department Policy must come from a place of law. Additionally, to suggest that citizens cannot sue against specific policy is to say that citizens will never be able to sue the government as policy and rulemaking is how government agencies uphold the law.

Finally, the Court left out the full excerpt of the policy: “The DOC/DCT reserves the right to terminate an auction at anytime for whatever. Should they determine that the auction is formed in bad faith/improperly conducted.” The auction was formed in good faith, and conducted to the best of the auctioneer’s knowledge with no complaints.

Supporting Evidence: