Appeal: Denied [2022] SCR 19 - Appeal Request

Status
Not open for further replies.

Neemfy

Citizen
Administrator
Homeland Security Department
State Department
Interior Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Supporter
Willow Resident
Neemfy
Neemfy
sergeant
Joined
May 13, 2020
Messages
338
- Client Name: The Commonwealth of Redmont
- Counsel Name: Department of Legal Affairs
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff
- Reason for the Appeal: There was a clear bias in the original case, and as a result the case was swept under the rug for over a year. The presiding Justice, fmr. Chief Justice Krix, has been a long time friend and political ally of xLayzur, and should not have been involved in a case pertaining to Layzur. Furthermore, the case was dismissed on the prospect that the evidence screenshots were not credible. Dismissal on this facet made it so other arguments could not be made, and lack of evidence is not a proper reason for dismissal.
- Additional Information:
 

seal_sc-png.37278

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

The Supreme Court has decided to deny this appeal. The Supreme Court has decided to do so on the basis that this Appeal has failed to cite a major error of law or facts that the Supreme Court made in the original case.

That being said, we will point out that the case was dismissed - meaning it never went to trial - and the court did not specify that it was dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore, there is no Statute of Limitations on Treason, Electoral Fraud, Corruption, Political Espionage, and violating a whistleblower's anonymity.

The Supreme Court sees no reason why the Commonwealth would be unable to file a new case against xLayzur if you have new evidence that supports the charges (the evidence in the original case is still considered unreliable).​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top