Lawsuit: Pending 1ILight vs coslos [2026] DCR 180

[William0324]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT​

1lLight, Plaintiff
v.
coslos, Defendant

PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Plaintiff's Counsel: Blueshadow0324, Solicitor
Date: September 29, 2026

---

I. PARTIES​

1. The Plaintiff is 1lLight, a member of the DemocracyCraft community and a member of the group known as the Communist Workers Company (CWC).
2. The Defendant is coslos, a member of the DemocracyCraft community who participated in the Discord discussion giving rise to this action.
3. The Plaintiff is represented in this matter by Blueshadow0324, Solicitor.

---

II. JURISDICTION​

1. This action arises from communications made within the DemocracyCraft community and concerns alleged violations of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
2. The alleged statements were communicated through a Discord thread associated with the DemocracyCraft server.
3. This Court has jurisdiction over civil disputes arising under the applicable laws of the Commonwealth of Redmont.

---

III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS​

1. At the time of the events described herein, the Plaintiff was a member of the Communist Workers Company (CWC).
2. During a Discord discussion on the DemocracyCraft server, the Defendant stated that the Plaintiff was not part of the CWC.
3. The Defendant additionally posted an image containing a gay pride flag in connection with the statement that the Plaintiff was allegedly not part of the team.
4. The accompanying message stated, in substance, “bro think he part of the team”, followed by crying emojis and a gay pride flag.
5. The Plaintiff does not identify as gay.
6. The Defendant additionally stated: “also I think that admitting that under a communist post will get you sent to a gulag.”
7. The statements and accompanying imagery were communicated in a Discord thread associated with the DemocracyCraft server.
8. Approximately five individuals, including the Plaintiff and Defendant, were involved or present in the relevant discussion.
9. The Discord thread was accessible through the wider DemocracyCraft server, which had approximately 1,700 or more members at the relevant time.
10. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant's statements and accompanying imagery caused reputational harm to the Plaintiff, including harm to the Plaintiff's reputation within the CWC.
11. The Plaintiff further alleges that the manner in which the statements and imagery were communicated contributed to the Plaintiff being publicly demeaned within the relevant community.

---

IV. PUBLICATION AND COMMUNICATION​

1. The Defendant communicated the statements at issue through a Discord thread rather than privately to the Plaintiff.
2. The communications were therefore capable of being viewed by individuals other than the Plaintiff.
3. Approximately five individuals were involved or present in the relevant discussion, including the Plaintiff and Defendant.
4. The relevant Discord thread was also accessible to the wider DemocracyCraft server community.
5. The Plaintiff alleges that the publication of the statements to third parties contributed to the reputational harm alleged in this Complaint.

---

V. EVIDENCE​

1. P-001 consists of an image showing the Defendant's communication concerning the Plaintiff's alleged membership in the CWC together with the accompanying imagery containing a gay pride flag.
2. P-002 consists of an image showing the Defendant's additional statement concerning the Plaintiff allegedly being sent to a gulag.
3. P-003 consists of the complete Discord thread containing the relevant discussion and surrounding context.
4. The Plaintiff may rely upon the above evidence to establish the content, context, publication, and circumstances of the Defendant's communications.

---

VI. INJURY AND HARM​

1. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant's statements caused injury to the Plaintiff's reputation within the CWC.
2. The Plaintiff alleges that the communications were viewed by individuals other than the Plaintiff and therefore had the potential to affect how the Plaintiff was perceived by members of the relevant community.
3. The Plaintiff further alleges that the combination of the statements and accompanying imagery subjected the Plaintiff to public ridicule and reputational harm.
4. The Plaintiff seeks monetary damages for the injury allegedly caused by the Defendant's conduct.

---

VII. COUNT I — DEFAMATION​

1. The Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
2. The Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §1 provides the applicable prohibition concerning defamation.
3. The Defendant communicated statements concerning the Plaintiff's membership in the CWC.
4. The Plaintiff alleges that the statements were false.
5. The statements were communicated to individuals other than the Plaintiff.
6. The Plaintiff alleges that the communications were capable of causing injury to the Plaintiff's reputation.
7. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant's statements were communicated in a manner capable of being understood as assertions concerning the Plaintiff rather than solely as private expressions of opinion.
8. The Plaintiff therefore brings this Count for defamation under the applicable provisions of the Redmont Civil Code Act.

---

VIII. COUNT II — SLANDER​

1. The Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
2. The Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §3 provides the applicable prohibition concerning slander.
3. The Defendant communicated the alleged defamatory statements through a Discord discussion associated with the DemocracyCraft community.
4. The communications were accessible to individuals other than the Plaintiff.
5. The Plaintiff alleges that the communications concerned the Plaintiff and were capable of damaging the Plaintiff's reputation within the CWC and the wider DemocracyCraft community.
6. The Plaintiff further alleges that the statements and accompanying imagery were used in a manner that publicly demeaned the Plaintiff.
7. The Plaintiff therefore brings this Count for slander under the applicable provisions of the Redmont Civil Code Act.

---

IX. APPLICABLE LAW​

1. Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §1 — Defamation.
2. Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §3 — Slander.
3. Redmont Civil Code Act, Part II, §9 — Intentional Violations, to the extent applicable to the Defendant's conduct.
4. The Plaintiff relies upon the foregoing provisions as the legal basis for the claims asserted in this Complaint.

---

X. DAMAGES AND RELIEF​

1. The Plaintiff seeks DC$2,500 in damages for the reputational harm, humiliation, and other injury allegedly caused by the Defendant's conduct.
2. The requested damages reflect the Plaintiff's alleged reputational injury within the CWC and the wider DemocracyCraft community.
3. The Plaintiff seeks a public retraction of the statements at issue through the same Discord medium in which they were published.
4. The Plaintiff further seeks any other relief that this Court determines to be legally available and appropriate under the applicable law.

---

XI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, through counsel, respectfully requests that this Court:

1. Find that the Defendant's conduct violated the applicable provisions of the Redmont Civil Code Act;
2. Award the Plaintiff DC$2,500 in damages;
3. Order the Defendant to issue a public retraction of the statements at issue;
4. Recognize the reputational harm allegedly suffered by the Plaintiff within the CWC and the wider DemocracyCraft community; and
5. Grant such other relief as the Court determines to be legally available and appropriate.

---

Respectfully submitted,

Blueshadow0324
Solicitor for Plaintiff 1lLight

Date: September 29, 2026

 

[Johnes]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT​

1lLight, Plaintiff
v.
coslos, Defendant

PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Plaintiff's Counsel: Blueshadow0324, Solicitor
Date: September 29, 2026

---

I. PARTIES​

1. The Plaintiff is 1lLight, a member of the DemocracyCraft community and a member of the group known as the Communist Workers Company (CWC).
2. The Defendant is coslos, a member of the DemocracyCraft community who participated in the Discord discussion giving rise to this action.
3. The Plaintiff is represented in this matter by Blueshadow0324, Solicitor.

---

II. JURISDICTION​

1. This action arises from communications made within the DemocracyCraft community and concerns alleged violations of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
2. The alleged statements were communicated through a Discord thread associated with the DemocracyCraft server.
3. This Court has jurisdiction over civil disputes arising under the applicable laws of the Commonwealth of Redmont.

---

III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS​

1. At the time of the events described herein, the Plaintiff was a member of the Communist Workers Company (CWC).
2. During a Discord discussion on the DemocracyCraft server, the Defendant stated that the Plaintiff was not part of the CWC.
3. The Defendant additionally posted an image containing a gay pride flag in connection with the statement that the Plaintiff was allegedly not part of the team.
4. The accompanying message stated, in substance, “bro think he part of the team”, followed by crying emojis and a gay pride flag.
5. The Plaintiff does not identify as gay.
6. The Defendant additionally stated: “also I think that admitting that under a communist post will get you sent to a gulag.”
7. The statements and accompanying imagery were communicated in a Discord thread associated with the DemocracyCraft server.
8. Approximately five individuals, including the Plaintiff and Defendant, were involved or present in the relevant discussion.
9. The Discord thread was accessible through the wider DemocracyCraft server, which had approximately 1,700 or more members at the relevant time.
10. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant's statements and accompanying imagery caused reputational harm to the Plaintiff, including harm to the Plaintiff's reputation within the CWC.
11. The Plaintiff further alleges that the manner in which the statements and imagery were communicated contributed to the Plaintiff being publicly demeaned within the relevant community.

---

IV. PUBLICATION AND COMMUNICATION​

1. The Defendant communicated the statements at issue through a Discord thread rather than privately to the Plaintiff.
2. The communications were therefore capable of being viewed by individuals other than the Plaintiff.
3. Approximately five individuals were involved or present in the relevant discussion, including the Plaintiff and Defendant.
4. The relevant Discord thread was also accessible to the wider DemocracyCraft server community.
5. The Plaintiff alleges that the publication of the statements to third parties contributed to the reputational harm alleged in this Complaint.

---

V. EVIDENCE​

1. P-001 consists of an image showing the Defendant's communication concerning the Plaintiff's alleged membership in the CWC together with the accompanying imagery containing a gay pride flag.
2. P-002 consists of an image showing the Defendant's additional statement concerning the Plaintiff allegedly being sent to a gulag.
3. P-003 consists of the complete Discord thread containing the relevant discussion and surrounding context.
4. The Plaintiff may rely upon the above evidence to establish the content, context, publication, and circumstances of the Defendant's communications.

---

VI. INJURY AND HARM​

1. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant's statements caused injury to the Plaintiff's reputation within the CWC.
2. The Plaintiff alleges that the communications were viewed by individuals other than the Plaintiff and therefore had the potential to affect how the Plaintiff was perceived by members of the relevant community.
3. The Plaintiff further alleges that the combination of the statements and accompanying imagery subjected the Plaintiff to public ridicule and reputational harm.
4. The Plaintiff seeks monetary damages for the injury allegedly caused by the Defendant's conduct.

---

VII. COUNT I — DEFAMATION​

1. The Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
2. The Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §1 provides the applicable prohibition concerning defamation.
3. The Defendant communicated statements concerning the Plaintiff's membership in the CWC.
4. The Plaintiff alleges that the statements were false.
5. The statements were communicated to individuals other than the Plaintiff.
6. The Plaintiff alleges that the communications were capable of causing injury to the Plaintiff's reputation.
7. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant's statements were communicated in a manner capable of being understood as assertions concerning the Plaintiff rather than solely as private expressions of opinion.
8. The Plaintiff therefore brings this Count for defamation under the applicable provisions of the Redmont Civil Code Act.

---

VIII. COUNT II — SLANDER​

1. The Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
2. The Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §3 provides the applicable prohibition concerning slander.
3. The Defendant communicated the alleged defamatory statements through a Discord discussion associated with the DemocracyCraft community.
4. The communications were accessible to individuals other than the Plaintiff.
5. The Plaintiff alleges that the communications concerned the Plaintiff and were capable of damaging the Plaintiff's reputation within the CWC and the wider DemocracyCraft community.
6. The Plaintiff further alleges that the statements and accompanying imagery were used in a manner that publicly demeaned the Plaintiff.
7. The Plaintiff therefore brings this Count for slander under the applicable provisions of the Redmont Civil Code Act.

---

IX. APPLICABLE LAW​

1. Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §1 — Defamation.
2. Redmont Civil Code Act, Part V, §3 — Slander.
3. Redmont Civil Code Act, Part II, §9 — Intentional Violations, to the extent applicable to the Defendant's conduct.
4. The Plaintiff relies upon the foregoing provisions as the legal basis for the claims asserted in this Complaint.

---

X. DAMAGES AND RELIEF​

1. The Plaintiff seeks DC$2,500 in damages for the reputational harm, humiliation, and other injury allegedly caused by the Defendant's conduct.
2. The requested damages reflect the Plaintiff's alleged reputational injury within the CWC and the wider DemocracyCraft community.
3. The Plaintiff seeks a public retraction of the statements at issue through the same Discord medium in which they were published.
4. The Plaintiff further seeks any other relief that this Court determines to be legally available and appropriate under the applicable law.

---

XI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, through counsel, respectfully requests that this Court:

1. Find that the Defendant's conduct violated the applicable provisions of the Redmont Civil Code Act;
2. Award the Plaintiff DC$2,500 in damages;
3. Order the Defendant to issue a public retraction of the statements at issue;
4. Recognize the reputational harm allegedly suffered by the Plaintiff within the CWC and the wider DemocracyCraft community; and
5. Grant such other relief as the Court determines to be legally available and appropriate.

---

Respectfully submitted,

Blueshadow0324
Solicitor for Plaintiff 1lLight

Date: September 29, 2026

Where's your evidence?

 

[William0324]

Sorry you're honor.

 

[Johnes]

Sorry you're honor.

I'm honor indeed.

I do not understand §§ II, IV, V, X, XI of your complaint. Please amend your complaint to follow the template, 48 hours to do so.