Search results

Greetings. Following the resignation of the Honourable ColonelKai, I will be taking over this case. As the Defendant has not submitted their cross-examination for the witness, and the Defendant has not requested any witnesses, we shall move on to closing statements. Plaintiff, you have 72...

Greetings. Following the resignation of the Honourable Colonel_Kai, I will be taking over this case. Please allow some time to sort through the pile of content you have placed at my feet.

The Attorney General was not summoned, Nacho was summoned. As you insisted, it was "very clear" that Nacho was the legal representative of the Commonwealth. @Nacho, please respond to the Plaintiff's questions in 24 hours. Otherwise, you will be held in contempt.

Court is hereby adjourned pending verdict. Thank you all.

This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice at the request of the Plaintiff.

I will hold off on responding to this until the 48 hours have passed for witness questions.

As the Defence has not submitted any questions for cross-examination, we shall begin direct examination of the Defence's witnesses. Defence, you have 48 hours to submit your questions for your witnesses.

Motion denied, as the Defendant is no longer deported. Objection overruled, as above. The Defence has 72 hours to submit their closing statement.

Apologies to @gribble19, I completely misread the witness requests. You are not required. Plaintiff, you may present your questions to your witness. You have 48 hours.

@gribble19, @End, @Angryhamdog, @1950Minecrafter, @Nacho, and @Staff Team are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

As the Defence has had 150 hours to submit their opening statement, we will move to witnesses. Witness summons are to follow.

Defence, you have 24 hours to submit your cross-examination of the witness (lukeyyy11).

Granted.

You may!

As no witnesses have been requested, we will enter directly into closing statements. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to submit their closing statement.

Denied. The use of “fraud” is not vague, scandalous, or inadmissible. It’s a legal claim the Court has been asked to evaluate. While the Defendant is presumed innocent of any criminal wrongdoing, they are being sued on the basis of fraud, which the Plaintiff is entitled to argue. Alleging fraud...

You may, but the insult was unnecessary. Any future attacks on opposing counsel will have you held in contempt.

The Plaintiff has requested only punitive damages and legal fees. However, punitive damages are only available when authorized by statute or when the Defendant’s conduct is outrageous. In this case, both parties acknowledge that the auction was ended prematurely due to a miscommunication within...

Thank you all. Plaintiff, you have 24 hours to submit your questions for your witness (lukeyyy11).

Approved. This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice at the Plaintiff's request.