Search results

1247

this is because horses arent real

Before revote on 5 november 2025

Vote: 4-0-0 (S-66/33) MOTION TO AMEND STANDING ORDERS Pursuant to Standing Order 5(1)—Senator Multiman155, has sought to amend the third standing order as follows: > 3 - Motions > (1) Proposal. Any motion originating in the Senate will be proposed in <#1173793183621201990>, and the President...

Vote: 4-0-0 (S-67/33) MOTION TO AMEND STANDING ORDERS Pursuant to Standing Order 5(1)—I, Senator Multiman155, seek to amend the Standing Order 4(4) as follows: > (4) Motion to Skip Hearing. In the event that no Senator wishes to ask the nominee any questions, aA Ssenator can motion for a vote...

I love killing foxes and ducks (in game) :love:

Before revote for S-63/33

AdmiralMusket55

yes

no

Aye, this is a significantly improved bill on the previous BAR related acts, i urge my fellow senators to vote aye

Aye, as explained before, and as i generally concur with representative rookieblue14 (from in game session)

Aye, as explained before, and as i generally concur with representative rookieblue14 (from in game session)

Vote: 3-0-0 (S-42/33) MOTION TO AMEND STANDING ORDERS I, President of The Senate Sofia2750, move to amend the Standing orders as follows: 4 - Senate Confirmation Hearings (1) Holding of Confirmation Hearings. When the President or President-Elect nominates any player to a position which...

Vroomfia2750

Razfia2750

Nay, celebrities are a fun little relic of the past, and shouldn’t be removed

Aye, this bill furthers town rights, and expands the purpose of roles like Oakridge sheriff.

Aye, this is an actual transparency proposal. It not being automatically declassified, could result in bullshit prosecutions because something is technically classified

Im voting nay for the same reason as multiman