Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The plaintiff asks a straightforward question of the judge: As a witness, being asked to familiarize yourself with the case before testifying, could your thought process be biased by the input provided in the evidence listed...

The defense requests that the judge waits until after opening statements to make a decision on this motion.

Rule 4.1 (Scope and Purpose of Discovery) The scope and purpose of Discovery is to allow all material to enter the court prior to the beginning of arguments for the sake of fairness. It is to enable fairness by allowing the parties to view the information so that they may properly formulate...

The defense concurs with the settlement, and appreciate the time the courts have given this case.

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Vroomba: You fired all the other CMs, was it for the same reason as xEndeavor? Why was the option to resign not given to the CMs, but given to those fired after them? Did xEndeavor claim projects without direct ping *before* he turned his attention towards SC? Was...

A BILL To Define Criminal Terminology The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short Title and...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Plura72 Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: In the recent court case FCR 39 2025, the Defendant spoke out of turn...

The plaintiff alleges that due to their time in the Dct, and the previous work done for the department, reducing one of the most time-consuming departments to discordcrafting is a good excuse for activity. In the 3 months of serving under Vroomba, the ultimate authority for the termination...

RESPONSE TO REQUEST OF PRODUCTION May 3rd: JustaDumpling, inactivity period of around ~2 months, warning not issued, offer to resign granted CrackedAmoeba, inactivity period of around 1 month, warning not issued, offer to resign granted Smokeybunnyyy, Inactivity period of around 2 months...

1) That is purely conjecture and estimation, and even so, the idea that "well beyond the secretary term" would mean double the time theyve been in office is a huge shift in scope. 2) You asked for all employees in your request for production, not just constructors. I hold my previous objection...

If you can provide explanations as to how you have come to the conclusion that the terminations made were based on activity before 3 months ago, I will agree to this compromise. 3 months is a significant amount of time in terms of Democracy craft, as that is over 1 congressional term, and...

RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES What was the exact date the decision to terminate the Plaintiff was made? April 22nd, as shown in the attached image, Interrogatory 1. What was the reasoning relied upon at the time of the Plaintiff’s termination? A mixture of inactivity and a shift in goals from...

A BILL To <Amend the Text Me Back Act> The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short Title and...

OBJECTION Relevance The Secretary of the DCT has not been in office for 12 months, and policy and standards between then and now has changed. As such, terminations before that point would not have any relevance to the actions taken by Secretary Vroomba. If the plaintiff wishes to amend their...

Response to Objection While this objection recaps a lot of the previous facts that the defense has already debunked, in the spirit of not badgering the judges, we will only focus on what we believe is new information provided to the case at hand. Application of Justification The plaintiff...

The defense request a 24 hour extension of discovery in order to deliver the request for production, Ive been stuck at work all weekend with extra shifts.

Response to Objection 1) "Prejudice" Prejudice is not a valid objection and should be ignored by the court accordingly. Alongside the fact that there has already been a motion to reconsider on the same points presented by the Plaintiff, who is simply just restating what has already been said in...

Your honor, the defense requests a response if it pleases you.

Your honor, The defense moves to admit the following screenshots into evidence: