Search results

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has voted to reject this appeal. The not guilty verdict and expungement were necessary to resolve the wrongful termination claim, given that the legality of the murders directly impacted the arrest and termination. The verdict does not pointlessly overturn a...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT RaiTheGuy v. lukeyyyMC_ [2025] FCR 30 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. The Defendant is considered a “gaming institution” under the Commercial Standards Act by auctioning multiple mystery box auctions, which constitute...

@gribble19 you have around 53.5 hours to present closing statements.

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to grant this appeal. The legal fees are increased by $10,000 bringing the total amount to $30,000 making it now the minimum of 10% under the Legal Damages Act.

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal. We believe that while rule 3.6 does give the plaintiff the ability to request default judgment, the presiding officer still has the ability to evaluate the case and ultimately rule for either party.

The plaintiff has 72 hours to present Closing Statements, after it is posted, the 72-hour timer for the Defendant will begin.

The defense will be given the same extension time of 48 hours to present opening statements.

The Plaintiff has 48 hours to present their Opening Statement. Immediately after it is posted, the 48-hour timer for the Defendant will begin.

Objection sustained. This court does not believe that the testimony of a former DCT Secretary regarding eviction policy has sufficient connection between the case concerning the DPA. The witness is struck.

They are being given simultaneously in order to keep the case moving within the timeline given by the Court Rules and Procedures. Both parties are still given the 72 hours allotted.

Both the Plaintiff and the Defendant are given 72 hours, running simultaneously to present opening statements.

Discovery has now concluded, the validity of the witness is pending and will be determined once the plaintiff clarifies the relevance of their testimony to the case.

Could you clarify specifically the connection between DCT policy and the matter at hand?

What is the relevance of a former DCT Secretary in a trial related to the DPA?

Regidrago

Those who have been already yes

The emergency injunction is granted, the court finds it neccesary to expand the current limitations set by the original EI in order to prevent potential harm. Secretary xDarkkex and any Acting Secretaries are temporarily prohibited from terminating or disciplining DPA employees for the remainder...

Extension granted.

The Motion to Reconsider is granted. We will now be moving onto Discovery, which will last 24 hours starting from this moment.

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court denies the appeal. The claim of $100,000 for emotional damages is in the opinion of this court an attempt to receive as much money as possible rather than a genuine reflection of the Plaintiff's suffering. The plaintiff has already received $67,000 and an...