Search results

Overruled. The Defense states their legal arguments as fact and expects the Court to simply assume they are true. It seems this case is about whether defense of another might be considered self-defense under Redmontian law. The Court finds this question worthy of litigation, and declines to...

Denied as moot.

Sustained

Sustained

If you only change coloring, just editing is fine. If you change any words, please provide a list.

Just the complaint.

The Defendant has a Constitutional Right "to have the assistance of legally qualified counsel for their defence." Thus, a Public Defender will be appointed.

The Defense is reminded to familiarize themselves with and follow the Court Rules and Procedures, and particularly Rule 3.2. The Defense is ordered to amend their Answer to comply with the rules within 24 hours.

Overruled. You are describing Default Judgement, not Summary Judgement. Even so, the Court will grant the Defendant a Public Defender instead.

You may have 24 hours from your post without further charges.

Overruled. The Court finds that the Constitution's positive right "to have the assistance of legally qualified counsel for their defence" supersedes Court Rule 3.6.1/3.6.2.

The Plaintiff has 72 hours to file their Opening Statement.

Discovery is now over, however, @farmerkalechip / @mortishuh still has approximately 24 hours to provide the aforementioned documents. As such, we are not yet moving on to Opening Statements.

Please present your Answer to Complaint within 72 hours.

CC: @smellyboi5

We will not be dismissing the case at this time. @Ediyto_ you are found in Contempt of Court for failing to follow the Court Order. You will receive an additional count for every 24 hours that passes until you adhere to the order. @KeyChunky321 the deadline for the answer is tolled until the...

The Constitution grants a positive right for legal counsel. Only a long-deported player (or a non-player, such as a company or Government)  may not qualify for a Public Defender.

The court finds ZapperyDoo in Contempt of Court for failing to appear. A Public Defender will be appointed.

The court has decided to dismiss this case with prejudice sua sponte as the Plaintiff has failed to provide a legal authority establishing the cause of injury as illegal or alleging that any application of law would find in favor of them (beyond the "Legal Code" - which could refer to any and...

This case is dismissed with prejudice as the Plaintiff still failed to identify a legal authority, such as a statute or common law principle, for their Claims for Relief.