Search results

  1. S

    Lawsuit: Pending melowy1 v. hydra10794 [2026] DCR 123

    @hydra10794 is commanded to appear before the District Court in the case of melowy1 v. hydra10794 [2026] DCR 123.
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MJL_ v. LegoMasterW472 [2026] DCR 118

    A public defender will be assigned for the defendant.
  3. S

    Lawsuit: Pending NovaKerbal v. landshaking [2026] FCR 61

    What would be the topic of your brief and what would its relevance to these proceedings be?
  4. S

    Lawsuit: Pending Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107

    @ThEd0cToR_ is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107.
  5. S

    Lawsuit: Pending Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107

    Very well! We will now move to witness testimony. The Plaintiff is reminded that at this stage of Inquest, they may "apply by motion for the issuance of subpoenas, writs, or summonses as the Court deems judicially prudent." Witness summons will come shortly.
  6. S

    Lawsuit: Pending NovaKerbal v. landshaking [2026] FCR 61

    Defendant was sent the following in-game mail.
  7. S

    Lawsuit: Pending NovaKerbal v. landshaking [2026] FCR 61

    @landshaking is commanded to appear before the Federal Court in the case of NovaKerbal v. landshaking [2026] FCR 61.
  8. S

    Lawsuit: Pending Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT COURT ORDER - INQUEST PROCEEDINGS Upon sua sponte review of the Defendant's punishment history, the Court finds that the Defendant has been banned. As such, the Court shall now proceed on Inquest. Discovery is now open, and will remain open...
  9. S

    Lawsuit: Pending Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107

    The Defendant has been sent the following in-game mail.
  10. S

    Lawsuit: Pending Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107

    @.Hannah35210 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Rqtting v. .Hannah35210 [2026] DCR 107.
  11. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Servalot v. Uwenn [2026] DCR 105

    This motion is granted. The case of Servalot v. Uwenn [2026] DCR 105 is dismissed without prejudice.
  12. S

    Lawsuit: Pending waygooda v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 60

    Excellent. Please post an answer to complaint within 72 hours.
  13. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Servalot v. Uwenn [2026] DCR 105

    Understood, please attach proof that the Plaintiff consents to be represented by the second chair as well.
  14. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Fractionnn v. hydra10794 [2026] DCR 106

    Acknowledged. Please submit an answer to complaint in the next 72 hours and edit the above message to show proof of representation as a permanent attachment (an image) in accordance with the Information - Court Rules and Procedures.
  15. S

    Lawsuit: Pending waygooda v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 60

    Yes. The Court would require the Plaintiff's written consent for your colleague to represent them, as proof of representation only extends to yourself in this case.
  16. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Fractionnn v. hydra10794 [2026] DCR 106

    Please reannounce your presence within 72 hours.
  17. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Fractionnn v. hydra10794 [2026] DCR 106

    @hydra10794 is commanded to appear before the District Court in the case of Fractionnn v. hydra10794 [2026] DCR 106.
  18. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Servalot v. Uwenn [2026] DCR 105

    @uwenn is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Servalot v. Uwenn [2026] DCR 105.
  19. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MJL_ v. LegoMasterW472 [2026] DCR 118

    @Palacity Counselor, if your intention was to have this: instead say "CIVIL ACTION", I encourage you to amend your filing. You have permission to amend only this section of your filing.
Back
Top