Search results

@Luke201556, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Luke201556 [2026] FCR 15

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Brick and Browse Inc. v. Pepecuu [2026] FCR 8 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION The defendant during their time as CEO of Brick and Browse violated both fiduciary and loyalty duties by participating in unauthorized self-dealing stock buybacks...

@YeetBoy1872325, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont. v Town of Oakridge [2026] FCR 13

Denied While I will admit I was wrong about the posting time. This trial as already moved forward. Even though it was late by a few hours it didn't impede the trial that much if at all. The court is also confused why the plaintiff is fighting so hard for a single contempt charge on...

OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Overruled. The plaintiff submitted their answer to complaint within the time alloted by this court MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Denied. The plaintiff submitted their answer to complaint in time unlike what this motion says. Additionally summary judgement has...

It has come to the courts attention that the relocated funds have been found and seized by the DOC approximately 3 hours ago at 5:23pm CST. The hourly contempt charges will have ceased at this time. The final count will be 53 contempt charges totally $265,000 in fines and 8 hours and 50...

UPDATE: The DHS has seize just about everything held in Pepecuu's name and is working on getting the last couple things. As for the relocated funds, there has been nothing from the DHS or the defendant's legal counsel showing any effort by the defendant to retrieve such funds as this court has...

Motioned Denied The order is in place to force the defendant to retrieve the funds that they relocated in violation of the court order. The court is not going to lighten it's penalty because of a potential verdict. The defendant violated a court order and is now receiving the consequences. If...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - CW's Motion to Recuse Analysis of the Court The prosecution argues in short that it is not the duty of a judicial officer when presiding over a trial to be proactive in any manner and must only be reactive to what the parties, but...

Fixed. I'm sorry I'm old enough to remember the DHS as the DOJ and still confuse the two.

After reviewing evidence provided by the DOC and hearing counter arguments by the defense within the sidebar. The court has come to a ruling. The court finds that Pepecuu did violate the emergency injunction and will be held in contempt. They will be fined $5,000 and imprisoned for 10 minutes...

Request denied. The information being disclosed by the DOC is not information the plaintiff would in any means be privy to as defined in the Privacy Act. The plaintiff will not be a part of the sidebar.

Granted

Denied The court is not going to send the DOC on a fishing expedition for something that is admitted being a "belief." If you have evidence of anything you are alleging, then provide it and the issue can be re-addressed

Motion for Summary Judgement Granted. Court is in recess pending verdict

As the charge being appealed happened in the Federal court, this is the wrong court to hear such appeal as it has to be filed in the superior court aka the Supreme court. Please refile in the Supreme court.

The Emergency Injunction is granted in full.

The 72-hour timeline will stand as given

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT IgnitedTNT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION The defendant failed to deal in good faith when entering into the transactional contract with the plaintiff when they knowingly did not have the funds secured to...

you have 72 hours to provide an answer to complaint