Search results

  1. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Administratively renamed to P-007 on consent from both parties. Not granted. While acknowledging that P-002 does not say what its caption purports it does, the evidence will not be struck on the grounds of duplication. The screenshots are not entirely identical, and multiple screenshots of the...
  2. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    All pending objections are overruled. Objections are to be made when procedure is breached, an individual perjures themselves under oath, or to evidence, testimony, and questions that are improper. Argumentation, which is a refutation of at-odds facts or legal theories, is to be had in your...
  3. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. wttn2c [2026] DCR 75

    @wttn2c is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. wttn2c [2026] DCR 75.
  4. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Thank you. Discovery shall now begin for a period of 5 days, or until otherwise ended by mutual agreement.
  5. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    You have 48 hours to produce an Answer to Complaint.
  6. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. wttn2c [2026] DCR 75

    You may. Summons will be issued momentarily.
  7. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    @rykazard is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Mmiqa v. Rykazard [2026] DCR 69.
  8. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. wttn2c [2026] DCR 75

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - Order to Show Cause The Court takes notice that, according to the prosecution, the offence charged is over a year old. The statute of limitations under both the CCA and the previous Standardized Criminal Code Act is 4 months, or 2...
  9. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: In Session Yeet_Boy v. Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] SCR 13

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - ENJOINMENT Defendant Commonwealth of Redmont requests a stay on "Commonwealth liability", which - seeing as no actual liability has been determined yet - we interpret as a request to halt that party's portion of proceedings until such...
  10. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: In Session Yeet_Boy v. Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] SCR 13

    You may. You have 48 hours. Seeing as a ruling as to this motion may significantly affect the timeline of proceedings, the Court will wait to request Answers from the Defendants.
  11. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: In Session Yeet_Boy v. Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] SCR 13

    Due to the lifting of the Supreme Court's administrative leave, the deadline to appear has been tolled to 10:51 AM Eastern Time (2:51 PM UTC) on Thursday the 11th. @Sofia2750 @Superwoops
  12. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: In Session Yeet_Boy v. Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] SCR 13

    @Superwoops and @Sofia2750 are required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Yeet_Boy v. Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] SCR 13. Further, I shall be the presiding officer in this case.
  13. Kaiserin_

    Appeal: Denied In re [2026] FCR 26 | [2026] SCR 10

    Associate Justice Anthropy writes the majority opinion of the Court. Associate Justice Matthew100x dissents. Appellant Ameslap appeals the sua sponte dismissal of Ameslap v. Commonwealth [2026] FCR 36. In so pursuing, Appellant argues on point of law that the trial court erred in applying the...
  14. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    This is my first time seeing this interaction and I have nothing to provide. This is my first time seeing this interaction, and I have nothing to provide. I don't know for certain. I wasn't privy to precisely what was included in the completed response, I only advised as to a couple questions...
  15. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    I note before my responses that the events in question occurred months ago, and my memory of this period is a little shoddy - I had a lot going on both DC-wise and in real life. I also don't have access to any of the records anymore. Nevertheless, by my memory, all of my answers are true. On...
  16. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxib02 V. Beloitte [2026] DCR 34

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT - Maxib02 v. Beloitte [2026] DCR 34 SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT Maxib02, Plaintiff, approaches the Court alleging that the entity Beloitte, Defendant, failed to uphold a binding contract requiring Defendant to produce a certificate of...
  17. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxib02 V. Beloitte [2026] DCR 34

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - SUMMARY JUDGMENT While noting the Public Defender Program's policy and request, this Court opts not to reach out to private law firms for the representation of the Defendant. Seeing little applicable and compelling precedent under the...
  18. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxib02 V. Beloitte [2026] DCR 34

    I'll grant an additional 24 hours for an update, seeing the PDD's edit to this post. EDIT: Noting that the original deadline hasn't passed yet, I'll instead grant until the end of the original deadline for a second update, if needed.
  19. Kaiserin_

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxib02 V. Beloitte [2026] DCR 34

    After conference with the Honourable Multiman155, I will be the new presiding officer on this case. Deadline for the appearance of a Public Defender remains in place.
Back
Top