Search results

Sustained. When submitting interrogatories; Notably, the Defendant is not CreeperTD but rather the BAR as a distinct legal entity. @MMiqa you may rephrase if you wish.

The statement is false, however the Court is not satisfied that the Plaintiff was aware of its falsity. At most, they weren't aware of its truth. However, making a guess (a careless and unsupported guess) is not providing knowingly false testimony. As such, the motion is denied. That being...

Very well. This civil action is dismissed with prejudice.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Rqtting Plaintiff v. .Hannah35210 Defendant Plaintiff @Rqtting approaches this Court seeking relief for an alleged breach of contract during a sale of netherite ingots which never materialised despite the Plaintiff having made...

Noted. Keep in mind that any dismissal at this stage would be with prejudice. Attorney General @Matthew100x, do you wish to file a response to the motion?

This appeal is dismissed at the request of the Appellant.

No party is compelled to answer interrogatories that have been objected to. I will review the objections in due time. Interrogatories that haven’t been objected to must be answered within 24h (if they haven’t been answered already)

Granted.

Is there any actual risk of dispersal of funds? And, wherever possible, proof of such risk?

I am your Judge.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Background On August 23rd, Judge Superwoops sent an unprompted message containing the word "legal" in the #legal channel of the DemocracyCraft Discord server. Shortly thereafter, MMiqa, the Plaintiff in this case, replied...

Case dismissed at the request of the Plaintiff.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBPOENA Federal Judge Superwoops, in the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, orders the Staff Team to produce the following records in accordance with this order filed in the case of StarKlower v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 73...

Discovery is now open and will remain open for 5 days.

Plaintiff, this is your last warning. Do not bloat this Court with meritless objections. The language used is fully permissible. Objection overruled.

Plaintiff, please review the Information - Court Rules and Procedures before throwing perjury objections around. You need proof that the statement is false, and proof that it was made in knowledge of its falsity. This objection does not prove that any statements were false. In fact, many items...

Overruled, Plaintiff is allowed to respond to objections without permission from the PO.

Overruled, Plaintiff is allowed to respond to objections without permission from the PO.

Sustained. Plaintiff has been warned. No content will be struck.

Objection overruled, this is essentially the same objection. Plaintiff is warned against boating this docket. (referring to Docket #82)