Search results

Ladies and gentleman of the court this entire case has proven to be nothing more than a waste of time, money, and resources for both parties. First of all the plaintiff's counsel doesn't even fully understand the current charges brought against the defendant, in their closing they argue that...

In-Game Name:RiggoSoft Business Name (if applicable):RiggoMart Location Of Business: (if applicable): Or-c081 Business Description (if applicable): We are a supermarket company that sells fireworks, food, minerals, etc Name Of Grant Sectoral Grant (Food services) Reason: We will use the $10,000...

I do not think I do may you elobarate?

unfortunately at this time we have decided to deny your grant. The DOC believes that approving this grant would not benefit Oakridge and its community.

You listed or-sp-15 isn’t owned by you can you elaborate on that

We believe at this time other applicants are more in need than you and the funds you applied for can be used more beneficially to Oakridge if not dispersed to you.

This grant has been denied due to the applicant already having recieved $50,000 grant from the Department of Commerce.

Your honor we actually have none

Your honor is there a time period you would like the defendant to conduct there follow ups?

Your honor this witness is crucial for defense and depriving the defense of having this witness now that they have made themselves present is depriving them of an opportunity of a fair trial and a fair chance to defend themselves.

The defense would like to ask the court to allow the defense to conduct follow up questions after all answers to all questions from all witnesses.

Your honor @MgChamp's answers are vital for our defense so we ask the court not to continue to closing statements until after they answer.

Your honor additionally I move for the court to find MgChamp in contempt of court as he has failed to respond to the writ of summons which is a lawful order of the court requiring the requested person to appear before the court. This clearly constitutes a contempt of court charge and as so the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Throughout the entirety of this case you have seen how the defendant had blatantly disregarded his contractual obligations to the plaintiff. It is clear that not only did the plaintiff fulfill their contractual obligations but granted the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY The defendant's counsel has intentionally lied about the plaintiff's counsel actions in attempt to dismiss the case. The defendant's counsel has falsely stated that "Plaintiff's failure to provide an opening statement and disregard for these...

Sorry the first part was the draft of the closing, I’ve been incredibly busy with family matters recently may I amend this message your honor?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT @Pepecuu @Superwoops plaintiffs opening

Some of the money will also be used for the procurement of the land.