I planned on "resolving" both claims at once. That would mean either formally dismissing the original complaint and giving my verdict on the counter-claim (in the case that you came to a settlement), or giving both verdicts at once. I trust this satisfies your desire here?
To start with, please don't say this is "presently open" if, in fact, it was not open at the time of posting. When you say it is already open, I then go back and look and see when exactly someone asked for a motion of reconsideration. It is annoying and a waste of my time and yours. When asked a...
I will be presiding over this case going forwards.
How things stand, as far as I can see: the court has granted summary judgment as to Defendant's counterclaim, which will be pending. As to the original claim, both sides desire to submit questioning to a witness. Is that all we have...
The Federal Court of Redmont issues two certified questions to the Supreme Court. These are: (1) Where the Federal Court's original jurisdiction over questions of constitutionality under Section 18(1)(a) overlaps with the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction under Section 20(1), and a...
I am not an idiot. Please do not insult my intelligence by asking for the status of an appeal I have been exceedingly consistent in updating the status of. You will wait and be patient. If you try to rush my proceedings again you will get a contempt of court charge.
This message serves as a notice to the parties of an update to the law. Parties should direct their attention to Part III § 1(6). @lukeyyy11 @MasterAshim
Associate Justice Smallfries4 writes the unanimous opinion of the Court.
The Commonwealth appeals the acquittal of Defendant-Appellee Inknet on two charges of unauthorized medical sale. Commonwealth of Redmont v. Inknet [2025] FCR 123. At issue, the Commonwealth alleges the trial court erred...
Re-renamed after a 2-0 Supreme Court vote. Case name as it appears is final and is the standard naming schemes for all appeals going forward. All appeals this year will be similarly renamed.
Following the passage of the Unified Constitution II Act, the Judicial Standards Act is no longer constitutional. As statute cannot amend or override the Constitution, the section giving the Speaker of Congress the role as acting Justice in this circumstance is no longer valid.
@Kaiserin_ is...
I am confused as to what exactly this is trying to say. Furthermore, absent a quorum of 2, I cannot answer any questions, provide any guidance, or do anything procedural with this case.
Final note: were it not clear already, with the recusal of Default Chief Justice Matthew100x, I will be...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.