Search results

  1. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Good afternoon your honour, I am respectfully requesting to have until Tuesday 5th of May at 10pm EDT, noting that I have an important exam coming up that I need to study for. Respectfully filed, AG Superwoops
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. Affirm. 2. Neither affirm nor deny, noting that P-02 does not show a message with that date. 3. Affirm. 4...
  3. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Social Democrat Party and Stanley582 v. Commonwealth Of Redmont [2026] FCR 29

    Good evening Your Honour, I am respectfully requesting a 12-hour extension as it’s exam season
  4. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. Vendeka Inc. [2026] FCR 16

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE, AMBIGUOUS, INCOMPETENT Your honour, these questions assume that there even was an accepted exchange rate, which is unsupported by fact. Furthermore, the question is imprecise: accepted by who...
  5. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    The Defense submits the following pieces of evidence in accordance with Docket #104.
  6. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    In regards to the motion to compel, we do not oppose any points except the first one. We ask that the request is specified, as producing these records may render a large amount of unrelated data. Specifying this request would ideally look like naming specific authors of any deletion of messages...
  7. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY The Plaintiff has perjured himself by stating that the Defense has produced "no such records" following the emergency injunction. The Defense did, in fact, present audit logs through D-001. The Plaintiff acknowledged the...
  8. S

    Expungement: Granted APPLICATION ZxRiptide [2026] FCR 31

    The Attorney General approves of this expungement request.
  9. S

    Lawsuit: In Session IgnitedTnT v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 20

    Hello your honour, I completely missed the part of your message requesting the CW to provide an answer. May the CW have 36hrs to provide its answer?
  10. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Your honour, Opposing counsel should be warned against making frivolous perjury objections. This objection fails both standards that need be met: Firstly, how should the Defense have assumed that the Plaintiff's intention when filing the EI was to have the Defense have (what appears to be) an...
  11. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Your honour, The Defense has complied with the motion to compel, which requested "Discord Audit Logs of the FRB Discord, from 25 February 2026 until the present." When one goes into the audit logs tab on mobile, this is the list that shows up, that is the list that was passed onto the DOJ by the...
  12. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    The Defense would like to respond to this motion, but first, we would like to know if it was filed inside Discovery or if the alloted time has elapsed.
  13. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Please note that duplicate pieces of evidence already in the Court record were not resubmitted
  14. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Because of the sheer amount of evidence requested in the above motions to compel, all evidence will be submitted in this message:
  15. S

    Expungement: Pending APPLICATION RaiTheGuy07 [2026] FCR 28

    Your honour, Applicant's counsel alleges that: a. The Court-imposed rule is in conflict with the CCA, and; b. The Criminal Code Act takes precedence over the Court-imposed rule. There is no conflict Let us first go over the wording of the CCA. Applicant reads "any citizen may file" as a...
Back
Top