Search results

Amendment granted, If satisfactorily changed, objection will be overruled.

Yea, I can`t see the attachments either. The Court will await your response, also you may re-upload attachments as necessary

DENIED. The existence of a lawsuit is not in of itself proof of a risk of asset dissipation. Please read the Regulations of the Federal Court. (You don't need to ask :) )

Thanks Knight Dearev, you have 48 Hours to respond.

@Jakku is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of RiggoSoft V. Jakkuwu [2026] FCR 25

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - IgnitedTnT v. RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC [2026] FCR 12 SUMMARY OF CONTROVERSY On February 18, 2026, this Court's predecessor in IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131 found LeafLuxury LLC liable for $100,000 in punitive...

Who is Jakku? That isn't a citizen in Redmont. Please provide the true name of the Defendant within 48 Hours.

Court is now in recess pending verdict.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - Certified Questions to the Supreme Court Mr. Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, Greetings. The Federal Court, as permitted under the Judicial Standards Act, does transmit to the Supreme Court a certified...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - Dismissal with Prejudice SUMMARY OF PROSECUTION This matter comes before the Federal Court on the Commonwealth’s Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause, filed originally in the District Court and subsequently removed to this...

@Rookieblue14 submission received. Objection regarding this filing is OVERRULED. The Perjury objection is likewise dismissed as academic. @dodrio3 You have until 4/9/26 @ 9pm EST to present a Closing Statement.

OVERRULED. First, Honourable Chief Justice Smallfries, he's not a Justice. (just nitpicking) Second, this is the only meaningful edit I see in the history and this doesn't materially change anything about the filing.

Sure, Response due by 4/7/26 @ 9pm EST

OVERRULED, I'm going to strike RiggoSoft's response as an emotional outburst. If Dodrio is here for both parties, then I'll hear Dodrio.

Granted.

The Federal Court halts the enforcement of the verdict pending a review of the appeal.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Show Cause - Standing The Court, in review of the Complaint and Constitution, is concerned that Plaintiff lacks standing to maintain the instant action. For this reason, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause to discuss why the action...

At your own risk. The Court doesn't order you to post this security, but if you do so voluntarily and proof is presented, the Court will order DHS to halt enforcement.

Do you have $13,000 to post as a security against the judgment?

Closing Statements due as follows: Plaintiff submission by 4/5/26 @ 9pm EST. Defense submission by 4/8/26 @ 9pm EST. Extensions granted within submission window.