Search results

defendant may respond within 24 hours.

granted

@Maxib02 The complaint seems to list savannah212467 as the plaintiff in the case but Maxib02 as the plaintiff in the parties section; could you please clarify on who is the plaintiff and if it is savannah, provide proof of representation.

I will be the presiding officer in this case. seeing as the defendant is permanently deported, this case is in recess pending a default judgement based on the known facts of this case.

Granted. sidebar will be moved.

Granted.

Staff has returned the writ.

i forgot to paste the ruling on the main message. Thank you for letting me know. perjury is Overruled. on improper evidence I will be Sustaining the improper evidence objection, the court finds it unlikely that the reactions given by the quote were reliable. by directly going to a possible...

I belive there was a slight misunderstanding here and the court apologizes for that. please disregard the order given for the plaintiff to compel. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF MANDAMUS The court requests that the staff team return to this court logs of ownership...

Motion to compel GRANTED plaintiff is ordered to produce the information requested within 72 hours. objection SUSTAINED Discovery shall now begin lasting 5 days from this message.

Sustained. Thank you. Denied. Overruled. "Evidence is proper/relevant" is not a recognized objection. see On Perjury the court does not see it fit, as no evidence of KNOWINGLY making a false statement has been provided. Please present an answer within 48 hours.

The Counterclaims are recognized, and we will now be entering discovery. Discovery will last 72 hours from this message. Granted. Please inform this court when an amendment has been made. acknowledged.

Present an answer within 48 hours

Sustained. no contempt will be issued however a PD will be called.

Granted.

please present an answer within 48 hours.

@12700k, is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Maxib02 v. FTLCEO [2026] DCR 12

upon looking at evidence the court has decided to grant this motion to dismiss. Altough the court sees that the statement was titled "council statement" internal chats provided shows that infact that statement was made by a councilour and not representing the whole council. This case is...

You may

@Novakerbal, is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Maxib02 v. NovaKerbal [2026] DCR 11