Search results

accidentally sent

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Oakridge Community Bank (Represented by RiggoSoft) Plaintiff v. dimitre977 Defendant COMPLAINT The plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: Written Statement I. Parties 1. Oakridge Community Bank (Plaintiff) 2...

Your honor may we have a ruling on these objections @ko531

Your honor even if the plaintiff is arguing breach of contract is a violation of the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, the case the plaintiff used was a decision based on a breach of contract charge not a failure to uphold the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing charge that was violated by...

There you are your honor feel free to rule on the objections whenever you are free

May I amend these objections your honor there seems to be a typo made by me

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Relevance Your honor, this case has nothing to do with breach of contract as breach of contract charges were never filed against the defendant. Therefore the statement above said by the plaintiff is irrelevant, and the defense moves to strike the...

Additionally your honor I have some objections and motions to file but its quite late my time so I am going to do them in the morning.

Ladies and gentleman of the court this entire case has proven to be nothing more than a waste of time, money, and resources for both parties. First of all the plaintiff's counsel doesn't even fully understand the current charges brought against the defendant, in their closing they argue that...

In-Game Name:RiggoSoft Business Name (if applicable):RiggoMart Location Of Business: (if applicable): Or-c081 Business Description (if applicable): We are a supermarket company that sells fireworks, food, minerals, etc Name Of Grant Sectoral Grant (Food services) Reason: We will use the $10,000...

I do not think I do may you elobarate?

unfortunately at this time we have decided to deny your grant. The DOC believes that approving this grant would not benefit Oakridge and its community.

You listed or-sp-15 isn’t owned by you can you elaborate on that

We believe at this time other applicants are more in need than you and the funds you applied for can be used more beneficially to Oakridge if not dispersed to you.

This grant has been denied due to the applicant already having recieved $50,000 grant from the Department of Commerce.

Your honor we actually have none

Your honor is there a time period you would like the defendant to conduct there follow ups?

Your honor this witness is crucial for defense and depriving the defense of having this witness now that they have made themselves present is depriving them of an opportunity of a fair trial and a fair chance to defend themselves.