Search results

@Franciscus @End The Court will enter recess for verdict on 1/29/26 @ 9am EST, in case there are other filings by parties. Furthermore, the Court issues the following order. Parties are not to ping the Court in any public channel in reference to this case, a legal theory reasonably construed...

Overruled, this is a factual disagreement that the Court already noted in its Predetermination Order. As to the Commonwealth's point, I'd agree. Plaintiff's use of "ignored" isn't colloquially appropriate and may cause confusion or judicial misapprehension. That being said, the Court doesn't...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - Writ of Mandamus The Court requests that Staff return the invite link for Anchor Watch as given to it when applied as to ascertain the present Owner of the discord server in question. So ordered, Judge Mug

@ToadKing @asexualdinosaur Any objection to the Court issuing a warrant to Staff to ascertain the current owner of the discord in question? I think this would be more definitive than asking this Court to guess.

Your Honour, After careful and prolonged discussions with Public Defender @Vernicia (who advocated for her client's interests extensively), we've come to a settlement agreement and wish for the Court's blessing: Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $40,000 in damages and 20% in legal fees Total...

Your Honour, Parties are in settlement discussions, requesting the deadline be extended by 3 days

The Court appreciates your appearance all the same, even though it looks like your looking at me a certain type of way. Answer to Complaint due in 48 Hrs.

Granted

Apologies, I didn't read the last paragraph, is the CW at this time waiving witnesses? If so waived, I'll issue an Order to Show Cause to BOTH parties as to the question of liability. This will be in lieu of a closing statement. The witness question period will be held pending your response.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Brief - Basis for Appeal, Interlocutory Review The above appeal appliation is taken from the order of Judge Ko, Federal Court, in denying interlocutory review in Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96, which held that the appellant failed to...

Username: Muggy21 I am representing myself What Case are you Appealing?: [2026] FCR 4 Link to the Original Case: Appeal: Denied - INTERLOCUTORY Muggy21 v. Hon Magistrate Vennefly [2026] FCR 4 Basis for Appeal: *see attached brief* Supporting Evidence:

@Dogeington You have 48 Hours to present Witness Questioning. Please review the Regulations of the Federal Court.

Sillyness, absolutely not. Deadline: An additional 119 minutes. 1/25/26 @ 1159pm

This is remanded to the DCR, the Court has original jurisdiction over cases involving more than 60 mins of jail time.

Sure

@Julia_ @_budo Opening Statements due on 1/27/26 @ 9pm EST.

Denied. As the argument is based on the Privacy Act, a Barrister would need to have an passed the Administrative Law Exam. As of 1/24/26 @ 4pm, you have not.

Granted, deadline for both parties extended by 24 hours. 1/25/26 @ 9pm EST.

Go for it

Created. Check discord for invite