Search results

They appear to have never been struck in the first place and will remain that way unless otherwise objected to, the witnesses will be able to answer these questions

@Omegabiebel @MgChamp @Aboundedcomet is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Ignitedtnt v. LeafLuxury LLC[2025] FCR 131

I agree

Hello, I am the new presiding officer of this case Overruled. None of the questions in of themselves are leading. If we were to ask each question individually to address your concern it would unnecessarly drag this case out and waste the court and the witnesses time. Summons to the witnesses...

Granted. Answer to complaint is due 48 hours after the original deadline

@Dogeington you have 72 hours to provide your answer to complaint.

Granted

MOTION TO RECONSIDER This type of motion was impossible to file any earlier due to witness questioning still needing to be done to establish evidence. We feel this motion should still be heard for this reason. Such a motion dealing with the lack of claim for a criminal prosecution is a big deal...

MOTION TO DISMISS - LACK OF CLAIM The Commonwealth has failed to prove or provide evidence that the crime allege even occured. The only crime being alleged is Breaching Attorney-Client Privilege which under Part IX section 10 of the CCA it is defined as: "discloses attorney-client...

We have no questions your honor

Well that makes two of use. We will both find out when the motion to intervene is filed by Multiman.

Before I require you to provide an answer to complaint, The court is going to handle the matter of a potential cross-claimant and the filing of the motion to intervene first.

@12700k is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Toadking & Omegabiebel v. 12700k[2025] FCR 129

Granted. Please do so in the next 24 hours

I am the new presiding officer of this case. I will be revoking the order to show cause by Honorable Muggy21. Summons will be issued shortly

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - Appeal of Contempt of Court Charges against Superwoops in [2025] DCR 96 Summary of Public Defender Superwoops's conduct in [2025] DCR 96 Superwoops after being assigned to this case by the Public Defender Director, reached a...

I am the new presiding officer of this case Lord @Technofied what is the status of the staff's investigation and is it still ongoing?

MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI As the law has been changed on the matter at hand, my main issue in the case has been solved and I wish to drop this case.

OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Asexualdinosaur is not an employee of the DOC and any internal routes the DOC would have to address concerns would not apply to Asexualdinosaur. All three questions should be struck

- Username: ko531 - What are your strengths and weaknesses?: Strengths are I work well with others and have the experience. Weakness is my availability. I am the type of person who likes to take a lot on as seen with my other terms in the DCR and FCR (a lot of it was not by choice as I was the...